Gun Control
The American 2nd Constitutional Amendment: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."

There are arguments in principle for Gun Control, and then there are practical reasons for why any Society would establish a Sanctioned, Authorized and Accountable Monopoly of weapons exclusively under the Controls of Civil Government. Most instructive, in both instances are the Laws of the United States in contrast to the applied behaviors of the United States. While still flourishing its 2nd Amendment with its rights to bear arms, with no small consideration being that the Gun Lobby ( The All Powerful National Rifle Association, which now picks the major candidates from both main political parties, or at least holds the power of effective Veto) that pays out just less bribe money to the Politicians than the Number One Lobby, that being the Lobby for Zionist Aggression, the United States, in regards its actual behaviors is the first to suppress Private Ownership of weapons, or even the existence of “Well Regulated Militias”, if they should exist in those lands and nations now being occupied by the United States. We can see for a fact that the Armed Forces of America are taking deliberate and concerted actions to not only disarm those with private military powers, but are actually conducting a War of Annihilation against those bearing Private Arms. Indeed, it might just as well be a second name for their “War on Terror”, as a War against any Armed Rebillion or capacity for Armed Rebellion.

Or we can look at the Policies of the American State Department, which ever insists that “Well Regulated Militias” disarm themselves, in the face of Aggressive Forces that have the approval and sanction of the Americans. We have the Americans demanding that the Catholics in Ireland unconditionally lay down their arms, while the Irish Protestants can maintain their arsenals and deploy British Mercenary Troops to front for their Aggressions. And we have the same American Demands in the Middle East – that the Palestinians Victims of Zionist Aggression unconditionally roll over and completely disarm, all while America grows the Israeli Armed Forces by 4 Billions dollars of Weaponry each year (though I suspect a few hundred Million are kicked back into the American Political Lobbying Machine – keeping the Pump well primed for future Allocations). So it would appear, that without the accompaniment of a great good deal of bribery money, to give backbone to American Resolve to maintain the universality of the Second Amendment, that practical considerations would have all rebellious organizations disarmed, or at least those inimical to the interests of the Best Paid American Political Lobbies.

One would hope that people who believe in Democracy would consider the Power of the Vote to be sufficient for any popular redress for whatever grievances might arise. And in an Age which almost universally deplores “terrorism”, it would make a wise man question how any Independent Militias, and especially how armed individuals, are in any way “necessary for the security of a Free State”, when it would seem that the only effect their arms could bring to bear is to assassinate politicians with whom there is some disagreement, or to hold political bodies under armed duress who would otherwise decide Public Policy differently, if they were permitted to be “Free”. So we have a contradiction in this Constitutional Terminology, where instruments of coercion are supposed to be guaranteeing “Freedom”. At most, America should admit that Private Arms and Roving Militias may only guarantee Rebellion, for which they are happy enough, as their Country was conceived out of a successfully murderous Rebellion. And yet their own extremely bloody defense in their own Civil War shows that Americans are not so universally in favor of Rebellion, not when it is themselves struggling to hold onto Political Power.

We must awake and acknowledge that what is Born of Rebellion need not maintain a Rebellion. The French, the Russian, and the Chinese Revolutions have all admitted, that while Arms and Violence were at first expedient, that the continued Threat that Private Arms have on the Political Process and adversely upon Society (in Crime, Accident and Suicide Rates) are against any measure of interest or advantage. Indeed, although the West is loud to denounce the Chinese suppression of the Tiananmen Square Rebellion, one finds a measure of inconsistency in that the West also had loudly denounced the “Cultural Revolution Rebellion” that occurred back in the Sixties, and was also accompanied by ‘talk’ of Democratic Reforms, but in practice was only a movement favoring a younger and more predatory set of politicians against those already established in power, as who else would resort to Rebellion when every avenue is open to Institutional Involvement, as any Chinaman is perfectly free to join their Communist Party. The difference between the Murderous Cultural Revolution and Tiananmen Square was that China had taken the intervening 30 years to assure that the civilian population would be disarmed. So, now, China grows at a healthy 8% a year. Yes, I suppose that the Americans do wish that China had reverted back into revolutionary chaos. As it stands now, with its clever and crafty Population not expected to be at constant armed conflict with itself, China is on its way to be the undisputed Most Powerful of World Economic Powers – as each New Chinese Dynasty has always been. America, on the other hand, with its Rural Whites already armed to the teeth, and with its Minorities now arming up (as young Gang Members can hardly be expected to sell their AK-47s just because they turn 21) we can anticipate that eventually America will be impeded with a serious bout of internal armed conflict. All those Gun Nuts will think they are fighting for “Freedom”.