Thread: Progression In Iraq

Originally Posted by imran_p

I support a gradual withdrawal,
i was merely pointing out that the logic behind more troops is to fight armed insurgents not suicidie bombers
[/b]

You said that sending more troops would be effective in reducing the power of the primary component of the insurgency that threatens the future of Iraq. But you think we should slowly withdraw from this point any way? Why?

Anyone catch the Bush interview on 60 Minutes tonight? I hope an American surprises me by answering yes to that question....I'm sure that the '24' premiere was much more important for most of the country.

It was pretty intense...the interview I mean, not the premiere...not a lot of sucking up, just hardhitting questions. I suggest youtubing it tomorrow when someone puts it up.

Originally Posted by bradybaker

Anyone catch the Bush interview on 60 Minutes tonight? I hope an American surprises me by answering yes to that question....I'm sure that the '24' premiere was much more important for most of the country.

It was pretty intense...the interview I mean, not the premiere...not a lot of sucking up, just hardhitting questions. I suggest youtubing it tomorrow when someone puts it up.
[/b]

Canada is interested in our television shows? That's flattering. What did that biased ass show sqeal at Bush about?

Video

Whatever side you're on, it's pretty interesting.

EDIT: that's actually a pretty liberal editing job...I'd recommend seeking out the whole thing for a less biased look.

Because, Unviersal, the insurgents are not like an organised army, that can run out of recruits
for every single one that dies, 5 more will join the fight
just like bombing hezbollah in an attmept to destroy them
tthey loved it
for every one that dies, its like a giant cmpaign for them
sending mroe trrops is lyk throwing wood at a fire in an attempt to put it out
Imran