I'm having trouble following what you just said, but I'll try to respond as best as I can.

All I was saying is phrases such as "steadfast" and "down to earth" are relative terms that can't be proved or disproved. Saying, "The republican party is more down to earth than the democratic party," doesn't do anything but give a vague positive sentiment to the republican party, whereas saying something like, "The republican party is more conservative than the democratic party," is a positive statement that can be helpful to a person deciding what party to vote for.

Vague words do work on ignorant people, because by definition of them being ignorant, they don't know anything else but those vague words, so of course they would vote for something that they are told is more "down to earth." That is why I want to fight ignorance by making positive statements to inform people of facts, then let those people decide what they want to do.

I'm not sure where you are going with the senator thing, or the politically correct thing.

I'm not trying to be politically correct, I'm trying to use facts, and "the republican party is more down to earth than the democratic party" is not a fact, whereas "the republican party is more conservative than the democratic party" is.