Thread: What Do You Suggest We Do?

If America was a good world police, they would have invaded darfur. If preventing genocide is not on a police-officers priority list, or at least not higher then fighting a (also bad) 'terrorist-regime', please explain why.

Originally Posted by Neruo

If America was a good world police, they would have invaded darfur. If preventing genocide is not on a police-officers priority list, or at least not higher then fighting a (also bad) 'terrorist-regime', please explain why.
[/b]

Because Holland would protest against it. Don't mess with Holland!

Really, every U.S. decision to go to war is based on a list of reasons. Darfur has a humanitarian problem like Iraq did under the Hussein regime, but Iraq was about many, many things, such as what we saw as a major threat of WMD terrorism resulting directly or indirectly from a severe enemy that had previously engaged in mindless WMD terrorism. The Iraq list was a whole lot longer than the Darfur list. I still think we should go in there and change the government. I think a union of nations should be formed and liberate every country that is not free. If all of the free nations of the world were interested in a free world, we could have one really soon. Think about that.

So, Neruo, do you think the United States should invade Darfur?