Thread: 9/11 Truth

Originally Posted by Trojan

Not sure if this has been mentioned, but when have you ever seen a controlled demolition start at the top?

Controlled demolitions start at the base of the structure - so anyone that claims it looked like a controlled demolition has never seen one.

I think this was addressed earlier, or in another thread, but thanks for bringing it up.

Top Down Controlled Demolition

There is no reason a top-down demolition couldn't have been used.

And then look at WTC7, it doesn't seem to start at the top.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEPjOi2dQSM

Originally Posted by memeticverb

I think this was addressed earlier, or in another thread, but thanks for bringing it up.

Top Down Controlled Demolition

There is no reason a top-down demolition couldn't have been used.

Perhaps, but those explosions on the video were very obvious and only included a few floors.

For the WTC, the collapse started directly below the impace point, so either those planes were guided to the correct floor or they wired every floor.

And then look at WTC7, it doesn't seem to start at the top.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEPjOi2dQSM

Yes - this one does look more like a controlled demolition. But is there any physical evidence to support the theory? Any eyewitnesses to the teams of demolition experts that would have been needed to plant the explosions?

Has anyone ever asked a controlled demolition expert what it would take to wire all three buildings? How many teams, how many hours? And then all it would have to be done and leave no physical evidence and no eyewitness to the work.