Thread: science is helping racist

Originally Posted by Moonbeam

That is not a good analogy at all. They pick the white person to work in snow because their skin is better at making vitamin D? I don't get it.

If white people are scientifically proven to be better adapted to perform in colder conditions, is it racist to hire someone in a job in which cold conditions are experienced based on one's race? What don't you get about that?

Originally Posted by wasup

If white people are scientifically proven to be better adapted to perform in colder conditions, is it racist to hire someone in a job in which cold conditions are experienced based on one's race? What don't you get about that?

White people have light skin so they can absorb vitamin D in less light, they don't necessarily make better snow-shovelers. I was saying that men not having boobs is a lot different than not hiring black people to work in the snow.

Never mind. That paragraph is one of the more inane things I've ever said, but you drove me to it.

Originally Posted by Moonbeam

White people have light skin so they can absorb vitamin D in less light, they don't necessarily make better snow-shovelers.