First of all I did not bother myself reading all your long post. Looks like you absrobed too much information without analyzing it through.
I disagree with Darwins theory.
I even wrote an essay about it. Ill post it here for your information. Certainly we are not monkeys.
If we would agree with the fact that we live in a machine world as Newton, Descartes and Einstein stated in their works, every human either a random mutation by Darwin’s theory, how can we explain the sudden increase of human intellectuality changed in one century?

How come it took us million years to evolve from apes to Homo sapiens who used basic natural instruments for survival, when in only 50 years we could produce a machine unique of its kind such as computer that can perform incredible functions? One hundred years ago, people used candles instead of lights, used carriages instead of cars and suddenly cars were introduced as the new vehicle in 1900.
I understand we evolve intellectually and move forward but who can explain the sudden huge advancement in only few years? Einstein would argue with his notion of atoms, billions small particles that form a physical human being that can randomly mutate and most likely produce cell arrangement.
Cells form thoughts and according to many scientists thought is a reflex of the movements of the atoms, small particles jumping around from one orbit to another. Descartes would explain the fast increase of technology due to some chemical reactions produced in our brains.
But our body is composed of 8 billion atoms and the certainty of atoms each fusing together is one to 8 billion, so it is impossible that the majority of atoms when fuse, create a sudden change in intellectuality, even if this is true it would take billions of years to get to stage where we are. Yes we are composed of atoms, but I disagree on the fact that we act upon some chemical reactions happening in our mind.
Darwin dismissed a fact in his theory that leads to a misunderstanding, if every human being has unique fingerprint and unique DNA and on our planet habited by 8 billions of human beings live, if we were a random mutation, at least one pair of human being would have the same DNA, which is not the case.
If human being origins from apes, how come apes still exist in form of animals if we started to grow and evolve physically in the same environment? Creation started with all living beings surviving together until the state of Earth changed and islands formed from collisions out of space, the story of Big Bang for example. We can assume that after one comet fall on Earth separation occurred in the continents, some species dispersed on different places.
This phase lets assume is called the beginning of the evolvement.
On one side apes live on an island and on the other side of the continent reside the other apes. There is a small probability that these apes on two different continents will evolve in the same way physically, due to their different environment. It is impossible that one island of apes evolves into a human being while the other one does not. Since the evolvement starts at their point when they split up, they should evolve in the same way, maybe in shape differently, but intellectually the same, unless some other factors contribute to their evolvement. They go trough environmental changes possibly differently, but Darwin explains that only one population one an island evolves while the other one doesn’t make a lot of effort. He thought that is why apes still exist. He proclaims as if time stops for one species to evolve mentally while the other evolves too fast. The probability of highly intellectual mutation is low and mutations in a population can be expected to obey more regularities than those among individuals, because of the similarities in survival benefits and the laws of large numbers.
“When a beneficial mutation spreads to the whole population, it will tend to carry along nearby base pairs, thereby reducing genetic diversity in its neighborhood. The size of the neighborhood is related to how fast it spreads. If it spreads to the whole population in about 1000 generations, then the size of this neighborhood is about 100,000 base pairs, since crossovers generally occur once in 100 million base pairs and there would be a thousand fold multiplications of them in this time. Thus 30,000 such mutations could essentially eliminate all the genetic diversity in the DNA if they were evenly spaced throughout the DNA and spread rapidly enough. They would have to spread in a total of about 400,000 years to produce the observed low genetic diversity. However, the fact that humans still have considerable genetic diversity (in blood types, for example) suggests that this mechanism has not been operating” (DNA Technology in Forensic Science 1992). This passage clearly states one of the reasons why a random mutation could not occur, eliminating the possibility of highly intellectual mutation of apes.

So read this again and reorganize your thoughts.
Thanks