Thread: I'm not ashamed to admit I hate feminists.

Originally Posted by Korittke

I was talking gender-wise, in general. This includes individual variation. It is implied that the reader understands this concept.

I.e. Women aren't as funny as men and never will be. This is because funniness is a central sign of attractiveness in men whereas women only need to understand humor and look good. (Evolution etc.)

Yet, there are some decent female comedians (half of which are funny by imitating male humor) and some unfunny men.

And if you think that there are "plenty" of heterosexual women who find feminine men attractive then I can only assume that this ginormous misjudgment is due to lack of straightness on your part.

I just disagree, I think most of guy's arguments on this topic are driven by their own self-preservation of masculinity.

I totally don't think your right when it comes to being funny, women aren't funny? Maybe you are too busy criticizing them to meet a funny girl.

I do admit that on TV you generally see more male comedians then women, I do however think it has NOTHING to do with who is funnier. I think the reason you see more male comedians on tv is because, who runs the media?

Men run the media, in turn that's why you see ONE womans channel: Lifetime

and about 1,000 guy channels, you flip through the channels and the majority of the 'entertainment' is male driven.


Also, why do you assume there are nearly no hetero women who like feminine men? Also, hetero women aren't all women, there are many bi-women and gay women, of couse the gay women don't find any men attractive, BUT there are a SLEW of bi women who just adore guys just like me, shy quiet, compassionate and sorta feminine.

Originally Posted by guerilla

I totally don't think your right when it comes to being funny, women aren't funny? Maybe you are too busy criticizing them to meet a funny girl.

I didn't say women weren't funny.

I do admit that on TV you generally see more male comedians then women, I do however think it has NOTHING to do with who is funnier. I think the reason you see more male comedians on tv is because, who runs the media?

Doesn't make any sense. According to that logic we'd only have gay porn since men run the porn business, hence they only want men on the screen.

Demands and ratings determine whether something is on TV, not gender.

Men run the media, in turn that's why you see ONE womans channel: Lifetime

and about 1,000 guy channels, you flip through the channels and the majority of the 'entertainment' is male driven.

See above. Doesn't make any sense. If there's more demand for male entertainment then that's what's going to happen.

On the other side, there are more bullshit useless fashion, celeb, gossip, pop-psych, diet, dating, anti-depressive makeup magazines that are almost exclusively aimed at women. What's your point?

Also, why do you assume there are nearly no hetero women who like feminine men?

I don't assume this, I know so for a fact.

Originally Posted by Korittke

I didn't say women weren't funny.

Doesn't make any sense. According to that logic we'd only have gay porn since men run the porn business, hence they only want men on the screen.

Demands and ratings determine whether something is on TV, not gender.

See above. Doesn't make any sense. If there's more demand for male entertainment then that's what's going to happen.

On the other side, there are more bullshit useless fashion, celeb, gossip, pop-psych, diet, dating, anti-depressive makeup magazines that are almost exclusively aimed at women. What's your point?

I don't assume this, I know so for a fact.

I don't even know how to reply to this.

Originally Posted by Korittke

Dominance is what keeps society going

Football is not what keeps society going. It's what keeps society from going anywhere. Dominance is pointless when your mind is in a box. May as well run around naked having an orgy. The trophy would go good on top of the television. Cause you were tough. Carried a dead animal skin over the line without getting raped by the other players trying to pull your pants down.

Originally Posted by Minervas Phoenix

Football is not what keeps society going. It's what keeps society from going anywhere. Dominance is pointless when your mind is in a box. May as well run around naked having an orgy. The trophy would go good on top of the television. Cause you were tough. Carried a dead animal skin over the line without getting raped by the other players trying to pull your pants down.

Would you kindly shut your piehole.

Originally Posted by Korittke

Would you kindly shut your piehole.

Would you kindly get a conscience.

Originally Posted by guerilla

Would you kindly get a conscience.

Thanks, mine is pretty good. Excellent, even.

korittke, i really can not believe how ignorant you are. you are sexist, bigoted, aggressive, homophobic and rude. i'm really glad i have only encountered you online, if we met in real life i think i would vomit with repulsion. you should really think about how you put yourself across. you may find it brings you more friends.

Originally Posted by guerilla

Also, why do you assume there are nearly no hetero women who like feminine men.

Because it's the truth. I know plenty of people who know girls that they like who are going out with assholes. They always end up being the nice guy you described, being nice, considerate, and understanding. They help the girl through her problems with the guy she's going out with, and then returns to her boyfriend she is too stupid to leave. She never once sees the nice guy who is helping her out and listening to her problems as someone she'd be going out with, because they are just "friends."

This has happened too much for it to be a mere coincidence between all the friends I know that this has happened too. This is how it is.

And Minervas, what is your problem with football? Men see plenty of things women enjoy watching on TV or in real life just as pointless, so you may as well drop the issue.

Also, this may just be my masculinity talking, but I'd definitely rather go up in nuclear extinction than have women turn all men into effeminate males and make this world go down "peacefully." I'm alright with effeminate males, don't get me wrong. It's just that forcing that kind of stuff down someone's throat isn't really the right thing to do. Besides, "breaking up the gender mold" and giving up masculinity would basically result in our early extinction. It isn't only a man's instinct to dominate, but protect his land. Women are just as able to protect their land, but this "feminine" world you speak of... it's main goal is to wipe out that thought process. We'd be left defenseless against nature.

I mean, all men do are create guns and war right? Guns can't possibly protect us from wild animals too, right? They can only be used to kill people!

Believe it or not, weapons can be used to defend us, too. If your feminine dominated world ever happened, I assume we'd stop making guns and ammunition, or any weapons, because then it wouldn't be such a perfect, peaceful place. All of the other species in the world would rip us apart. You notice how a pack of wolves is operated? Oh right, either a male or female dominates the pack. The same can be said for many animals. Animals that try to get rid of that which protects them usually get wiped clean off the face of the earth.

Don't even try and tell me that that isn't what you had in mind when you were thinking of this feminine dominated (funny how that word can be used to describe what you want to happen, yet you are against domination) world, because if you didn't change any of that stuff about the guns or other weapons, then how would the world have changed? It wouldn't have, and men would be right back in power.