Thread: I'm not ashamed to admit I hate feminists.

It is fing evil to deny a child life. This is not only about the woman, that is a completely selfish view. A vesectomy is not equal to abortion, having the woman's tubes tied is. Which i have no problem with btw.

Originally Posted by tkdyo

It is fing evil to deny a child life. This is not only about the woman, that is a completely selfish view. A vesectomy is not equal to abortion, having the woman's tubes tied is. Which i have no problem with btw.

Note the wording, child. The correct term is foetus. If the foetus is not conscious, then it is just a clump of cells. There's nothing there to suggest a human in the eyes of someone who values consciousness.

It is about the woman. We have come a long way to ensure equal rights to women, why the fuck should we start taking steps back all of a sudden? Why should you deny a fully conscious, fully developed, sentient being the right to its body, just because there's a clump of cells (which are not conscious, not aware) inhabiting inside that being's body? Where is the logic in that?

Originally Posted by bluefinger

Note the wording, child. The correct term is foetus. If the foetus is not conscious, then it is just a clump of cells. There's nothing there to suggest a human in the eyes of someone who values consciousness.

It is about the woman. We have come a long way to ensure equal rights to women, why the fuck should we start taking steps back all of a sudden? Why should you deny a fully conscious, fully developed, sentient being the right to its body, just because there's a clump of cells (which are not conscious, not aware) inhabiting inside that being's body? Where is the logic in that?

sorry for the double post.

Note your wording as well, I said not ONLY about the woman. The logic is that this clump of cells are the only ones that can become a sentient being. If you think it is a step back to ensure the life of another sentient being then we are at an impasse.

Originally Posted by tkdyo

sorry for the double post.

Note your wording as well, I said not ONLY about the woman. The logic is that this clump of cells are the only ones that can become a sentient being. If you think it is a step back to ensure the life of another sentient being then we are at an impasse.

And yet most fertilised eggs don't get to attach to the uterus, because most get washed away by that 'convenient' time of the month. So, by your logic, every woman who has had more than one period is a serial killer.

The voice of reason... right here

yeah, thats exactly what im saying