Thread: Iran

Iran's asset privatization policy is a strategy to avoid military strikes by the USA and Israel or to freeze out American economic and strategic interests despite the threat of sanctions.

Were these economic sanctions to be carried out and enforced they would paralyse the trade and monetary transactions. They would also undermine Irans privatization program and foreclose the transfer of Iranian state assets into foreign hands.

Why would the bush administration be opposed to the adoption of a neoliberal-style divestment program, which would strip the Islamic Republic of Iran of some of it's most profitable assest? If economic conquest is the ultimate objective of a profit driven military agenda, what then is the purpose of bombing Iran, when Iran actually accepts to hand over its assets at rock-bottom prices to foreign investors, in much the same way as in other compliant developing countries including indonesia, the philippines, Brazil etc.

The proposed economic sanctions regime is intended to isolate Iran and prevent the transfer of Iranian assets into the hands of competing economic powers. it is a tantomount to a declaration of war.

Tehran's privatization program does not serve US economic and strategic interests. If favors Chinese, Russian, European and Japaneses investors at the expense of American. It goes against Washington's design to foster a 'unipolar' New World Order through both economic and military means.

And that is why Washington wants to shut down this program through a worldwide economic sanctions regime under H.Con. Res 362. (look it up)

Financial manipulation is intimately related to military decision-making. Major banks and financial institutions have links to the military-intelligence apparatus.

Originally Posted by Minervas Phoenix

Iran's asset privatization policy is a strategy to avoid military strikes by the USA and Israel or to freeze out American economic and strategic interests despite the threat of sanctions.

Were these economic sanctions to be carried out and enforced they would paralyse the trade and monetary transactions. They would also undermine Irans privatization program and foreclose the transfer of Iranian state assets into foreign hands.

Why would the bush administration be opposed to the adoption of a neoliberal-style divestment program, which would strip the Islamic Republic of Iran of some of it's most profitable assest? If economic conquest is the ultimate objective of a profit driven military agenda, what then is the purpose of bombing Iran, when Iran actually accepts to hand over its assets at rock-bottom prices to foreign investors, in much the same way as in other compliant developing countries including indonesia, the philippines, Brazil etc.

The proposed economic sanctions regime is intended to isolate Iran and prevent the transfer of Iranian assets into the hands of competing economic powers. it is a tantomount to a declaration of war.

Tehran's privatization program does not serve US economic and strategic interests. If favors Chinese, Russian, European and Japaneses investors at the expense of American. It goes against Washington's design to foster a 'unipolar' New World Order through both economic and military means.

And that is why Washington wants to shut down this program through a worldwide economic sanctions regime under H.Con. Res 362. (look it up)

Financial manipulation is intimately related to military decision-making.

Agree 100%. If only you used these keen critical thinking skills to evaluate your own preconceived notions about quackology.

Originally Posted by Minervas Phoenix

Major banks and financial institutions have links to the military-intelligence apparatus.

Highly doubtful. Never assume a conspiracy when incompetence will suffice. In other words, the US government can manipulate Wall Street using the Fed without giving intelligence away.

Incompetence is not the answer to things like going into Iraq with false evidence. How incompetent do you need to be before you lie about evidence? You need to be competent liar it's takes effort and planning to make things up that are convincing when there is no actual evidence.

Originally Posted by Minervas Phoenix

Incompetence is not the answer to things like going into Iraq with false evidence. How incompetent do you need to be before you lie about evidence? You need to be competent liar it's takes effort and planning to make things up that are convincing when there is no actual evidence.

I agree about Iraq. But you really have to learn to look at situations independently. Just because the government deliberately lied about Iraq, that does not mean they flew planes into the WTC, or that they're giving intelligence information to bankers, etc. Always critically examine everything.

When you look at things on their own you don't see the bigger picture. Things lead to other things. Also if you agree about Iraq which of course you should. You can't have even 1% confidence left in the Bush administration. That is worthy of impeachment.

Follow the trial of evidence and where do the bankers tentacles lead? The Rockefeller, CFR, bilderberg, Trilater commision, intelligence community and more.

If you look at things independently you will have no hope. You have to fit the pieces together then you understand why they do things.

You got skull and bones Verses Agartha. That's about 8 million to 10 thousand. The New world Order enslavement was always going to fail from day one. Look at how many people know about it. And the end game only just started. They are already behind schedule. Iran is meant to be blown up by now.

You got thousands of people networking against them at this point. There is a 911 conference coming up in sydney soon. Australia has it's own network.

Originally Posted by Minervas Phoenix

When you look at things on their own you don't see the bigger picture. Things lead to other things. Also if you agree about Iraq which of course you should. You can't have even 1% confidence left in the Bush administration. That is worthy of impeachment.

Follow the trial of evidence and where do the bankers tentacles lead? The Rockefeller, CFR, bilderberg, Trilater commision, intelligence community and more.

If you look at things independently you will have no hope. You have to fit the pieces together then you understand why they do things.

No, fitting pieces together the way you do is called being delusional, you fruitcake.