Quote Originally Posted by drew View Post
Laughing man - If you look at the evidence, the eart really is at a critical state. The climate debate is far from over stated, it's massively understated.
Yes nothing like mother hen's running around screaming the world is coming to an end. Does one need to bring up Al Gore's Doomsday prediction concerning global warming?


Quote Originally Posted by drew View Post
The reason? It's simply not profitable. Look up (a real, not in the realm of 9/11 bullshit) the conspiracy with esso, where it was discovered that they paid scientists to discredit claimte arguments that would force them to shut down their oil facilities. We could face extinction, it is a possibility.
Yes yes, someone is always saying we could face extinction in every age. It's either millennialism, Y2K, global warming, global cooling, world wars, Mayans, gays getting married or whatever bizarre occurrence one could conceive. Scientists on both sides are capable of bias and I don't need to tell you about the recent email scandal concerning climate change to prove that to you.

Quote Originally Posted by drew View Post
But very unlikely. Humans are emotive creatures; rationale is something that must be taught or discovered, it is not innate.
Rational isn't something taught. You can't teach people what is innately moral or immoral. You do know what rationalism is right? The exercising of reason.


Quote Originally Posted by drew View Post
When a major environmental impact occurs the whole world will react emotively, with international demands for extremely radical changes in green policy. People are reactionary, it is an unfortunate truth.
That's ridiculous. You are claiming that everyone is 'reactionary'? How do ideas progress or get put forth if everything is just a reaction to another thing?