Thread: Homosexuality, how can it not be considered an abnormality?

Originally Posted by byungsukimmishi

Your political categorization of me or my political categorization of you?

Yours of me. I have no idea about your political ideas.
Nor would I take them into consideration in a scientific debate.

I have been arguing solely biological in this thread. And with you I only argued
the point that it's not really a question of wether you believe that there are animals
that have homosexual intercourse, but it's just an established fact.

However my inital argument in here is that it's a flawed concept to reduce evolution
to reproduction and that homosexuality is perfectly explainable in its context. And
that there are indications for homosexuality not happening on accident or because
of a dysunction, but because of its benefits on a larger, non-individual based scale.

Edit:
(Just to adress the argument of choice; I think psychological damage that can occur,
if one tries to falsly force oneself into a heterosexual relationship, even with no prior
engagement in the act itself, shows how little of a choice some have.)
I agree with Taosaur's explanation on the top of the page.