Thread: if LDing is real then what about. . .

"Getting there"...since when does that mean that I can? It doesn't. Jeez you are seeming less and less bright with every post! Maybe no one should be listening to YOU anymore. That seems the better course of action seeing as all you do is be mean, sarcastic, and have a closed mind. You don't argue, you simply ridicule. Go find something better to do.

Oh and btw, it was a half joke. I can't fly, yet....my point was, it's a goal in the future, hehe.

Originally Posted by magicdood

"Getting there"...since when does that mean that I can? It doesn't. Jeez you are seeming less and less bright with every post! Maybe no one should be listening to YOU anymore. That seems the better course of action seeing as all you do is be mean, sarcastic, and have a closed mind. You don't argue, you simply ridicule. Go find something better to do.

Oh and btw, it was a half joke. I can't fly, yet....my point was, it's a goal in the future, hehe.

Why does everyone spout off "closed mind" when someone disagrees with something they say? That seems so incredibly stupid I just can't fathom why it's used so much. If someone says they are violating the second law of thermodynamics and I refuse to believe them without proof positive, am I having a closed mind? No. That law is pretty much set in stone and extraordinary claims require some extraordinary evidence.

I don't have a closed mind. I'm perfectly willing to try new things. But do you even understand the claim you're making and how big it is? And you don't even try and provide evidence for it and just say that we're are "closed minded"! I'm sorry if you feel I "don't argue" and "simply ridicule" but give me a break. You just claimed that a goal of yours in the future is to fly. Sorry but...

It's not going to happen.

As for your Psi claims, that's false as well but I'm certainly more willing to believe that than you flying, but you still provide no evidence.


I still maintain that you and gumpy or gumby or whatever should just read one of our minds and prove it for real.

You say "That's false as well" and yet you argue that you aren't close-minded? Seems a little contradictory to me.

The fact that you are telling me that it's false allows me to think that you are close-minded. Do you know why? Because I've seen myself perform Pk. So I have every right in the world to call you close-minded.

Dude, wig, you ARE close-minded. YOu aren't asking for proof, you are just saying "0i!? T3l3k1n3s1s IzsnT r33l!!!!!111one!!one" That's all i see. If you REALLY want to find out. Train, try to do it, and... When you do, you will feel silly :p. I have a guide HERE

Originally Posted by Seismosaur

Dude, wig, you ARE close-minded. YOu aren't asking for proof, you are just saying "0i!? T3l3k1n3s1s IzsnT r33l!!!!!111one!!one" That's all i see. If you REALLY want to find out. Train, try to do it, and... When you do, you will feel silly :p. I have a guide HERE

You didn't read a goddam word I said. Why should anyone believe anything that far fetched without proof? And if they don't, why are they "close minded"?

They are certainly not close minded just cause they do not believe. Definitely not. That would be dumb. They are close minded because they will not accept the possibility of it being a fact and are not willing to try and find out more information.

check out biosupermindpowers.com.....or google Ingo Swann......I just read all the threads, this is an interesting site

Originally Posted by The Wig

You didn't read a goddam word I said. Why should anyone believe anything that far fetched without proof? And if they don't, why are they "close minded"?

Without proof..We gave you the proof. And yes, I am saying I can do it.

Originally Posted by magicdood

So I have every right in the world to call you close-minded.

Not close-minded: logical and sensible. As has been said, when you claim to break the known laws of physics, YOU are the one who must provide proof - not the other way around.