Similar to the reason why we suffer infantile-amnesia; dreams within animals are virtually useless, or at least, never remembered anyway.
Considering the neurological aspect; only animals with a sense of self even had the possibility to have a dream, and (according to tests, we can still be optimistic in saying it is possible that other animals do) only other gorilla's, apes, etc. have such a sense of self. There are the rare tests that reveal arguements against such a theory (BF Skinners pigeons). However.. that's another topic..
But it is true; only animals with a sense of self can even have a possibility of dreaming because if you are not aware of your own existance, how or why would you even dream, or even think? It is logical (although argueable, yes..).
I should note that in the above when I say possibility to dream, I mean remember them. Because us humans are the only species with a culture and the ability to communicate more fluenty, have a sense of independance, ethics, morals, etc. We are also entitled to the capability of dreaming. However, in other animals, even if they dream, they will (best guesses would say, and logically) not remember any of their dreams because it is similar to the same reasons why normal adults do not remeber their dreams, and primarily, why we cannot remember any of our dreams from childhood (from years 1-3, roughly).
It has been debated throughout Freudians many times (and still) that dreams is the battle between the Id and Ego to reveal the true natural wishes; that all dreams are wish ful-fillments, most likely motivated by the Id. The argument is then that if animals can dream, how can they have an ego? When, in order to have an ego, there must be a structure of characteristics and intellectual aquisitions.
Hm..
Hope I've been enlightening somehow..
|
|
Bookmarks