hmm ok, i take that "ridiculous giberish" (sic, forgive my bad english, im not american) perhaps is a strong term... i'd say more of a "hollywood-type" of writing...
I never said i had "PROOF" (look for that word in my post) that he was a fraud, i said i've seen he was exposed in the internet (i dont recall where, i just recall it was someone who was a coleague of him at the university, and attested that he NEVER traveled to meet any sourcerer in mexico during those years, also someone who suposedly wrote a book with an interview of CC and later revealed it was ghostwriten and CC was never interviewed at all).
The "bad" thing about his books sounding like scripts is that real life is hardly like that. Somnum pointed out well.
I read his books because i was a teenager looking for fun and amusement, my mother had them at home, i never liked TV, and i had too much free time back then (ah, the good old days... )
About the mixing: he takes concepts and practices from old shamanic traditions, he takes things from yoga practices, he takes things from magick backgrounds (like Crowley) and mix it all into Don Juan's "teachings"... thats why i said he's not completly wrong, because he actually takes things that are valid in its respective traditions, and even effective! Im not saying the books have NO value, im saying i dont believe a word of it to be "real" true, point.
"Not being wrong in a concept" = some concept he taught is valid/effective, like using your hands to gain lucidity... or pressing the tip of your tongue to the roof of your mouth etc.
Also his recolection of events is almost super-human when you think about it... the details and dialogues and stuff...
I've taken some mind altering substances - LSD, mushrooms, ayauasca (known as 'Santo Daime' here in Brazil), and it just doesnt fit his descriptions, sorry.
Thats just my opinion, im not the owner of the truth!
best regards
TBW
|
|
Bookmarks