"For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction."
Newtonian mechanics are irrelevant in a world where the laws of physics mean nothing.
This sounds like an attempt to come across as intelligent and knowledgeable, but instead you spout scientific facts in the wrong context.
Your argument is based on a fallacy that people will act out fantasies in the real world. Many of us are healthy rational people who are more than capable of doing stuff that would be considered unethical in a fictional world of your imagination, but would refuse point blank to take these actions in the waking world.
The difference between the two is that no one gets hurt in the dream world (and there are no real life consequences), whereas this is not the same in the real world.
Let's say you kill someone in a lucid dream. Why is this no different from killing a fictional character in a video game? Aside from that a LD might be more realistic, there is not really much difference between the two.
In spite of many attempts to do so, there is no evidence that violent games, films, music, pictures, or any other form of media cause rational beings who can understand fact and fiction, to go out and commit such acts. Those that do such acts are found to have some form of mental illness.
Furthermore, it might well be that allowing people to act out fantasies in a safe setting is actually better. In the same way that the propagation of online pornography was shown to reduce the amount of rapes, it is not inconceivable that violent media may allow people that would tend towards these kinds of crimes to act them out in a safe setting. In this regard, lucid dreaming is just another means to do so.
I believe that dreams and dream content serve natural biological and psychological functions designed to help keep us healthy, happy and solve problems. If we force lucid dreams unnaturally or make too much effort to control or sustain them, could we be interfering with the natural purposes?
Is our subconscious always in control for a reason? Doesn’t it already know how many lucid dreams, the intensity, duration, type of content, amount of control, when we are ready, how much we can handle and what we need,… when and why? Do lucid dreams start AND end for a reason? Are lucid dreams essentially unnatural?
This is all simply speculation. I'm not saying that concerns aren't justified, but seeing as we barely know about the processes that make up dreaming, and there is documented evidence of the many positive effects, and no evidence of negative side effects, to keep insisting that LD is dangerous is irresponsible.
The only dangers are if the individual becomes addicted to lucid dreaming and desires to escape reality constantly, or if the individual is unable to distinguish fact from fiction.
|
|
Bookmarks