 Originally Posted by baseballmk92
The simple fact that our bodies are laying in bed while we sleep is nearly enough to show that dreams are just from our imaginations.
I don't see how that could show that dreams are imaginations.
 Originally Posted by baseballmk92
And, for the sake of argument, in order for dreams to be anything but our imaginations, they would have to take place somewhere other than on Earth.  And every dream's setting is completely different.
Ah, come on. That's made up out of thin air.
 Originally Posted by baseballmk92
I understand your argument that until we prove anything, we can't assume anything to be true, but I don't see the substance and evidence from your P.O.V. either. To me, it just seems illogical that our dreams are 'real' and actually take place.
First, I don't need to prove my view. Respect for others demands us to act cautiously if there is the possibility our actions may cause harm.
Second, it is not illogical to assume dreams are real. Otherwise we would have a scientific proof. I think you wanted to say it does not feel right for you to accept the reality of dreams, but that is just your bias, not a fact.
 Originally Posted by baseballmk92
I mean, society basically accepts that our dreams are not real, since, after all, we don't leave our beds during our sleep.
You mean the body does not leave the bed. We are not our bodies though. And about society... it supports many obviously wrong and ill things. I guess I don't need to elaborate that.
 Originally Posted by baseballmk92
If you're going to say you believe they are real, you should really support that with something. It's a completely radical idea.
No, it isn't. And it's not a new idea. It may be radical for most westerners though, but we have been cut off from our spiritual roots anyway. We're materialists and being that, we are very poor people.
 Originally Posted by baseballmk92
Where, if not on Earth, do dreams take place?
Where? When? Does space even exist? Scientists today have accessed maybe 0.05 percent of what may be in our universe. The rest is not perceivable, not even with instruments. And that's what scientists say themselves. So basically we know next to nothing.
I don't know how the universe works, but I'm sure it works a lot different than we think it does today.
 Originally Posted by baseballmk92
How can the settings of our dreams all be different?
They aren't always different. Apart from that I cannot answer that. But I don't need to. I can just ask back how it comes that the setting in waking reality is always the same? You will not be able to answer that sufficiently too.
 Originally Posted by baseballmk92
Why don't others remember what happened in our dreams if they were characters in our dreams?
Because they weren't there. I met people I know or knew in my dreams. They weren't the same persons. They were made up, trying to imitate people I know. DCs can access your memory and they use it to get you involved in situations they create, for whatever reason. If you meet someone you think you know again, look closer.
 Originally Posted by baseballmk92
Why is it that we can feel our physical bodies during lucid dreams in light sleep?
Well, why is it consciousness can be in many places at the same time? I don't know, but I do know that it is possible. I've had various such experiences using entheogens.
 Originally Posted by baseballmk92
How is WILD'ing, transitioning from the waking state to a lucid dream without any lapse in consciousness, possible, if dreams take place in some other 'place'? Something, like a soul, within us would need to leave our bodies.
I don't know, but what if the spirit does not need time to reach places (assuming space exists) as the body does? Or is the body simply too restricted so it cannot perceive the layers of reality that exist at the same place and time? Read this: http://www.geom.uiuc.edu/~banchoff/Flatland/ It won't answer your question, but it'll show what I mean. A classic read.
 Originally Posted by baseballmk92
If religious beliefs are behind your ideas, I won't argue.
Actually no, my point of view relies on what is known and what is not known. As I said, we know next to nothing and that is not a secret. But somehow many people assume we have explained the universe already. We haven't and we probably will never understand.
 Originally Posted by baseballmk92
I'm not religious, but arguing with religion is not only an argument that inevitably leads to no winner, but those arguments shouldn't bother to take place, anyway. I just want to hear the basis for your ideas, because I see no reason to think that we're exiting our physical bodies to some other reality during the night. I can't prove it...
Exactly that's the point. You don't know.
 Originally Posted by baseballmk92
but I don't see why it should be suspected, or why it should be possible.
And I don't see why it should not be suspected or why it should be impossible. We both don't know and we both can neither prove nor disprove it.
 Originally Posted by baseballmk92
The stages of sleep and dreaming are so well-documented,
Nope, only externally measured brainpatterns are documented. It let's us assume a few things about the body, nothing else.
 Originally Posted by baseballmk92
along with the science behind hallucinating,
There are many hypotheses about that, but no hard facts. Did you know that most of the pharmaceuticals used today are just used because they are empirically known to work, yet it is unknown how they work. Probably you didn't know it. That's how it is though.
 Originally Posted by baseballmk92
that the idea that dreams actually take place seems to just be coming out of nowhere, whereas the contrary, and more common belief that dreams are just our imagination, has much more reason and evidence behind it.
Reason and evidence? Where? Can you give that to me? No, it's just the commonly accepted opinion, which does not prove its correctness. There were times when people thought that black people were not real humans, but half animals. So they put them into zoos or made them slaves. That was commonly accepted too, even by scientists.
 Originally Posted by baseballmk92
Just because dreams seem as real as life does not mean they really are real.
Well, but that's more evidence for their realness than against it, correct?
 Originally Posted by baseballmk92
From your posts in this thread, you seem to understand science/psychology more than most of us...so I'm a bit bewildered by the fact that your actual ideas and beliefs about dreaming greatly defy science.
Defy science? Not really. Talk to a scientist who knows what he or she is doing and you'll see they are very humble people, because they know that what they know is really not much. And even the few things they know could be disproved another day. That happened many times and it will happen many more times.
Most people seem to mix up science with religion. They claim to have no religion, yet they base their view of the world on what they think science is. Remove every hypothesis, every speculation, everything that has not been proven and in relation - yes, I'm going to repeat myself - we know nothing. Even worse, wrong knowledge is less than nothing, because it is an obstruction on the way to knowledge you first have to overcome.
Knowing nothing, we have to assume everything is possible and because we are conscious beings capable of care and love, we must be cautious. Do we know that dreams are just imagination? No, we don't. Do we know the opposite? No, we don't. But is it possible that our actions in dreams can be harmful to other conscious beings? Yes, that is possible.
|
|
Bookmarks