Service pack is a bunch of big updates for Windows, some of them are quite important, so I recommend installing that. The most significant update in SP2 is Security Center that gathers all Windows' security settings to one place. |
|
Okay, i'm a little stuck. |
|
'all of the moments that already passed/
try to go back and make them last.'
Service pack is a bunch of big updates for Windows, some of them are quite important, so I recommend installing that. The most significant update in SP2 is Security Center that gathers all Windows' security settings to one place. |
|
Don't think about those damn kangaroos.
Service Pack 2 is a pack of security patches and crucial updates for Windows XP. You don't necessarily need to install it. I haven't installed it because I'm comfortable with Service Pack 1. It probably won't make your PC run faster. |
|
Hey, thanks for that..i might install it tomorrow...i don't see what harm it could do... |
|
'all of the moments that already passed/
try to go back and make them last.'
Currently i havent installed SP2 because im goin on the philosophy that hackers target the newer softwares because those are the most commonly used once they become automatic in updating them. My grandma just got a computer, and for windows xp now when you click "shut down" it automatically installs the updates before shutting down the computer, which is lame. So far my idea has been working since i am poor and cannot pay for a firewall/virus protection. Ever since I got DSL ive been really paranoid about viruses and such because now they can enter my system almost instantly. |
|
Except that all the security scanners that the script kiddie crackers use run through a check for all the published vulnerabilities... |
|
|
|
Yes always, always install the latest updates to keep protected. |
|
I downloaded SP2, and i have also downloaded Microsoft Antispyware, and got rid of a whole load of junk! |
|
'all of the moments that already passed/
try to go back and make them last.'
i have no idea |
|
|
|
Don't think about those damn kangaroos.
or you could just get an anti spyware programme...that seems to be helping me a lot... |
|
'all of the moments that already passed/
try to go back and make them last.'
What I find is that Microsoft Antispyware is about 75% of Spybot or Lavasoft's Adaware. |
|
Actually AdAware and Spybot are way better then Microsoft AntiSpy. AntiSpy does search more detailed than the other two but that has lead me to some annoyances in the past removing stuff that wasn't really spyware. AntiSpy also has trouble removing some types of spyware. You could run it over and over again and it'd just find and not delete malware. Adaware and Spybot actually do their jobs. |
|
I fully agree. Invariably, Spybot and Adaware will clean stuff that Mickeysoft doesn't. |
|
|
|
Oh - I'm not saying it doesn't help! |
|
Damn, I switched to Mac OS X about a year ago and had forgotten how much effort one puts into just keeping Windows manageable and workable. |
|
Insanity is the new avant-garde.
Yeah! Nearly 1/50th what a mac user has to put into finding a worthwhile title published to their platform! |
|
WOw... i run a pretty secure system and i dont do any of this stuff (except adaware). Maybe switchin to servicepack2 isnt such a great idea, cuz Ive never had any real problems with this machine for the 2 years and 4 months its been workin for me. (unless you count the 2 yr. and 3 months its been runnin on dialup...) |
|
|
|
Insanity is the new avant-garde.
|
|
Kim actually on my desktop I have denied updating to SP2 for about a year now, it's still running SP1. Granted with about 50 thousand trojans on it. |
|
I'd have the check the notices, but I believe in April it becomes mandatory. |
|
I don't want to hear about the brain from someone that doesn't have one.
Nor do I want to hear about evolution from someone that hasn't evolved.
|
|
Bookmarks