I read the topic title of "Idiot!!" noting the two exclamation points, then was immediately presented with a screenshot of IE |
|
Hey everybody, come look at what this idiot is saying on ATS forum. The story is about a man who puts drug in his mouth and the cop chokehold him trying to get him to spit the drug. But they both fell down and when they fell, the man got his neck broken. |
|
Last edited by bonthan; 07-18-2009 at 07:29 PM.
I read the topic title of "Idiot!!" noting the two exclamation points, then was immediately presented with a screenshot of IE |
|
(\_ _/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
^Quite right. Lack of knowledge actually equates to ignorance, which in my opinion is even worse than stupidity. |
|
Final Fantasy VI Rules!
Total LDs: 10 | WILDs: 4 | DILDs: 5 | DEILDs: 2
"Take atheism, for example. Not a religion? Their pseudo-dogmatic will to convert others to their system of beliefs is eerily reminiscent of the very behavior they criticize in the religious."
Oh so you wanna go word by word in the dictionary. What if instead of using "lack of knowledge" to describe my inexperience with picture inserting, I'm gonna use "do not know", because in the current situation, "lack of knowledge" and "do not know" both signify the fact that I had not insert a pic in a post before so I forgot to cut the IE frame. So when I changed it to "do not know", you wouldn't find it under "ignorance" definition in the dictionary, therefore "do not know" would not equate "ignorance" wouldn't it. So my point is that what is to be understood and what is said are two different thing. In the understanding, "ignorance" means "unwareness of". |
|
You do this every fucking time.
No sweat.
No tears.
No guilt.
You do this every fucking time.
http://www.myspace.com/theheroicopening
I don't know what kind of circus you are having in the States, but that doesn't sound like a proper use of force if you can tazer or spray someone if he is just using drugs and not being aggressive. That is just plain pathetic if the user of force cannot tame the person without lesser means. If you think of pepper spray, it is, at least here, one step below from the use of firearm. |
|
Jujutsu is the gentle art. It's the art where a small man is going to prove to you, no matter how strong you are, no matter how mad you get, that you're going to have to accept defeat. That's what jujutsu is.
Ok is that your opinion or fact based on your experience? You are in the security business? Can you prove that? If not then I would have to conclude that you don't know a damn thing about "using force are applied in the real world", therefore I'm not gonna argue because my view is different from yours. |
|
It is a fact based on my experiences and yes I have done security business and at the moment I am leader of military police squad in army, which supervises security of the military areas at the time of peace. |
|
Jujutsu is the gentle art. It's the art where a small man is going to prove to you, no matter how strong you are, no matter how mad you get, that you're going to have to accept defeat. That's what jujutsu is.
What are you talking about? I'm not condescending him. I respect the guy as much as I respect anyone in DV, but saying you are something on a forum is just not going to increase your validity or power of your opinion, and I'm not gonna offer an argument for the expected support because that's the argument I'm trying to avoid. The point of this thread is how idiotic the guy in the screenshot is saying that "we" should add this and that law. And how am I even pretentious? "if you are going to be pretentious"- if you're gonna assume something about somebody you better back it up with proof or not you'll be just as pretentious. |
|
Last edited by bonthan; 07-20-2009 at 05:16 AM.
I am vastly amused at the way you all completely missed Ynot's point. |
|
This entire thread is just lol. |
|
You merely have to change your point of view slightly, and then that glass will sparkle when it reflects the light.
|
|
"offered nothing in return" I already offered my view and it's in the very FIRST post in this thread if you pay attention and it is solely my opinion. And when he stated his view on the subject I want to avoid the argument because opinion vs opinion will lead to NOWHERE based on my experience on this forum. What I offered in the first post is that a criminal will not advertise before he attacks and Unelias is arguing my opinion using his, therefore I think the conversation is pointless and try to avoid that. Please pay attention before you chime in. |
|
Last edited by bonthan; 07-21-2009 at 06:57 AM.
Your opinion is that criminals will not advertise their attacks and...? So what should the cops do then? What force should be encouraged, if any? |
|
Oh for god's sake! I've told you my argument is in the FIRST post and I don't know if you're unawere of just plain fucking thick OR just annoying. I'm gonna save my self some times and not gonna reply to this thread anymore so you can be here and reply to yourself ok? Because whatever I said you're just gonna ignore and try to push your false accusation across. Ok so stay on this thread and have fun. |
|
Bookmarks