WHOAH, YOU THINK DILDS ARE MORE VIVID THAT WILDS???? |
|
I was wondering if anyone notices a difference between the lucidity they achieve when they have had a WILD as compared to a DILD. The majority (80%) of my lucids have been WILD, but I have noticed that they tend to be less vivid compared to the DILD's I've had. I'am sure this topic has been touched upon in the past many a times, but I'm posting it anyway. |
|
WHOAH, YOU THINK DILDS ARE MORE VIVID THAT WILDS???? |
|
"You will cease to exist!!"
*GASP* "But existing is all I practically do!!!"
bryan, I have to agree with MonkeyElk. |
|
Well let me just start out by saying that I know for a fact that I have had many Wild's. I've only had 2 or three DILD's but the ones that I had were extremely vivid. I think maybe why my Wilds aren't as vivid is because I somehow get stuck in between the crossover sometimes. It's almost like I'am lucid of the dream but the dream hasn't evolved into itself fully, if you understand what I'am saying. So maybe this is why my DILD's have been more extreme that my WILD's. |
|
I've had a few WILDs where the image was really fuzzy and faded for a while, but the more I explored, the clearer it got. By the end of the dream, I could almost swear I had vampire eyes or something because everything was so f#$king clear, lol (it looked much more clear than real life I'll tell you that). |
|
No doubt that with WILDs I have more vivid LDs. |
|
Bookmarks