Congrats on breaking dry spell! |
|
Last night, after a month's dry spell, I had a lucid dream. Unfortunately I fell back into a normal sleep and now I can't remember the dream. Bummer, but glad to have hopefully ended the dry spell. And even though I can't remember it, I'm still counting it as an LD. Hope nobody minds. |
|
Congrats on breaking dry spell! |
|
Thanks Checker. Love your encouragement. |
|
Hey! congrats on the progress. I'm curious how would you know that you were lucid when you can't remember it? I'm not doubting that you had a LD or saying that you lie |
|
hey Marty, mind humoring me and giving me a little summary of how well you keep up with the dream journal'ing? |
|
No, I don't mind. Up until two days ago, I wasn't keeping a journal at all. Although I do have a portable recording device by my bed, but I've hardly used it. After the dream incident mentioned above, I decided I should start keeping one. So I'm now keeping one fairly faithfully. |
|
Hold on a second! I've read that book and it's damn good, the points it makes about the hand reality check make a lot of sense, I think you completely misunderstood what it was trying to say. I've just got my copy out to double check. What it basically says is that the hand check has no solid reason/theory as to why it should work other than expectation. It goes on to say that other tests like the nose pinch check have a logical reasons to work and are more reliable. If you want to have less disappointment and more regular lucid dreams, you should choose a reality check that has a logical and practical theory for why it works. In the case of the nose check its because the nose you pinch in the dream isnt responsible for your breathing but the hand check just seems to rely on expecting it to work. The book even explains about how the hands are probably one of the most familiar parts of our bodies so our brains aren't likely to have problems copying them in a dream but it also goes on and says that it's worth experimenting with yourself to see if it works for you, but suggests against it in favour of other tests that would probably be more reliable. That seems like good advice to me. |
|
Last edited by spaceexplorer; 07-04-2013 at 12:12 AM.
Bookmarks