 Originally Posted by Mes Tarrant
I don't understand that sentence... are you saying that there were multiple you's and you saw out of all the pairs of eyes?
Yes, that I was trying to do. I didn't succeed 
 Originally Posted by Tornado Joe
Hi Little Philo,
The 360º vision refered to in Waking Life is the ability to see in 360º around you - so your point of reference would have to be from you (the way you see now, out your head).
I was refered on that idea 'cause it hard to imagine in awake state that image you would have if you can see in 360º. And that I was talking about is kind of a similar thing - it's hard to imagine...
 Originally Posted by therpgmaker
I believe he's saying he wants to (or already has?) be able to have mutiple versions of himself, and be looking through both (or more) pairs of eyes at the same time.
Thats right, and that is just beginning, I wont to expand that idea not just to see with two pair of eyes , but to actually be two person at the same time (two of me). But I didn't succeed that basic part, so I must be patient .
 Originally Posted by 1342576
I was just thinking about that film and how your idea was kinda similar before I read that. Why should we be limited to two eyes in a lucid dream? I like the idea, but I don't know if anyone has done it.
You would done it 
 Originally Posted by LdMichael
i dont understand any sentence he said. is english your main languange? if not, i understand. if so, take some kind of grammer classes.
I only learn English in primary school and by watching a movies .
I forgot to put in my signature "Sorry on my English" 
I wrote in some post before that it would be very complicated to me to describe a dream, 'cause some things I can't describe in my own language .
|
|
Bookmarks