• Lucid Dreaming - Dream Views




    Results 1 to 25 of 136
    Like Tree14Likes

    Thread: Consensus Reality

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      Drivel's Advocate Xaqaria's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2007
      LD Count
      WhoIsJohnGalt?
      Gender
      Location
      Denver, CO Catchphrase: BullCockie!
      Posts
      5,589
      Likes
      930
      DJ Entries
      9
      Quote Originally Posted by Universal Mind View Post


      Yes.
      So how does that have anything to do with "if there is nobody, it still exists"?

      The ability to happily respond to any adversity is the divine.
      Art
      Dream Journal Shaman Apprentice Chronicles

    2. #2
      Consciousness Itself Universal Mind's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Gender
      Location
      Everywhere
      Posts
      12,871
      Likes
      1046
      Quote Originally Posted by Xaqaria View Post
      So how does that have anything to do with "if there is nobody, it still exists"?
      Was anybody around for the big bang or the events between the big bang and the formations of the first observers? There is strong evidence that those events happened in time and that no observers existed yet. The big bang happened about 13.5 billion years ago.
      Last edited by Universal Mind; 04-08-2010 at 09:36 PM.
      How do you know you are not dreaming right now?

    3. #3
      Hungry Dannon Oneironaut's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2008
      Gender
      Location
      Dreamtime, Bardos
      Posts
      2,288
      Likes
      814
      DJ Entries
      5
      Perhaps you could dream that scientists have figured out that the big bang happened 3.5 million years ago but that 'objective' reality is dependent on the dreamer who dreams it up.

      What we call reality is a small range of frequencies in an infinite spectrum of frequencies of energy. There are infinite frequencies of energy and we cannot ever know them all.

    4. #4
      Consciousness Itself Universal Mind's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Gender
      Location
      Everywhere
      Posts
      12,871
      Likes
      1046
      Quote Originally Posted by Dannon Oneironaut View Post
      What we call reality is a small range of frequencies in an infinite spectrum of frequencies of energy. There are infinite frequencies of energy and we cannot ever know them all.
      Wow. That just really tripped me out. I don't know how much I agree with it, but I love it.
      How do you know you are not dreaming right now?

    5. #5
      Hungry Dannon Oneironaut's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2008
      Gender
      Location
      Dreamtime, Bardos
      Posts
      2,288
      Likes
      814
      DJ Entries
      5
      I am glad I finally tripped you out! Lol

      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." -Einstein
      Last edited by Dannon Oneironaut; 04-09-2010 at 01:15 AM.

    6. #6
      Member really's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Gender
      Posts
      2,676
      Likes
      56
      Quote Originally Posted by Universal Mind View Post
      Was anybody around for the big bang or the events between the big bang and the formations of the first observers? There is strong evidence that those events happened in time and that no observers existed yet. The big bang happened about 13.5 billion years ago.
      If there are no observers, the "the big bang happened about 13.5 billion years ago" relative to what?

    7. #7
      Hungry Dannon Oneironaut's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2008
      Gender
      Location
      Dreamtime, Bardos
      Posts
      2,288
      Likes
      814
      DJ Entries
      5
      Haha! "If there are no observers, the "big bang happened abput 13.5 billion years ago!" Very good!

      You see, we WERE the big bang! I am the big bang, you are the big bang, we all were the big bang. And all time is foreplay to another Big Bang.

    8. #8
      Member really's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Gender
      Posts
      2,676
      Likes
      56

    9. #9
      Hungry Dannon Oneironaut's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2008
      Gender
      Location
      Dreamtime, Bardos
      Posts
      2,288
      Likes
      814
      DJ Entries
      5
      And our growing understanding of the universe is actually creating the knowledge that we understand. The universe was created long ago, but it is still being created, even in our mind.
      At first, all energy exploded and then a half second later it condensed into heat and plasma and then a fraction of a second later it became hydrogen. And then helium, etc. Stars were born, the ambient temperature cooled and stars created heavier elements, matter formed, living beings formed, minds formed, knowledge formed, now minds create. Mind is a force of nature now and now mind is evolving. Objective reality is giving birth to subjective realities. Subjective realities form consensus realities and consensus realities are evolving back to absolute reality. What next? Spirit? And then another Big Bang? Maybe the moment all consensus realities unite with Absolute reality there is an orgasmic Big Bang again.
      Last edited by Dannon Oneironaut; 04-09-2010 at 04:53 AM.

    10. #10
      Consciousness Itself Universal Mind's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Gender
      Location
      Everywhere
      Posts
      12,871
      Likes
      1046
      Quote Originally Posted by really View Post
      If there are no observers, the "the big bang happened about 13.5 billion years ago" relative to what?
      You asked that question relative to what?
      How do you know you are not dreaming right now?

    11. #11
      Member really's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Gender
      Posts
      2,676
      Likes
      56
      Quote Originally Posted by Universal Mind View Post
      You asked that question relative to what?
      Relative to an observer who presumes the existence of time. It doesn't look like you have answered the question. Do you know what I mean?

    12. #12
      Consciousness Itself Universal Mind's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Gender
      Location
      Everywhere
      Posts
      12,871
      Likes
      1046
      Quote Originally Posted by really View Post
      Relative to an observer who presumes the existence of time. It doesn't look like you have answered the question.
      You didn't ask your question until I read it? I think you posted it while I was at Wal-Mart.

      It doesn't look like I have answered the question? What if I answer it next week? Wouldn't that mean, according to you, that my answer to your question is real now?

      Quote Originally Posted by really View Post
      Do you know what I mean?
      Do I know what you mean relative to what?

      I don't think your issue of "relative to what" is valid. The particles involved moved relative to each other. They didn't have to collectively move relative to another thing.
      Last edited by Universal Mind; 04-09-2010 at 05:59 AM.
      How do you know you are not dreaming right now?

    13. #13
      Member really's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Gender
      Posts
      2,676
      Likes
      56
      Quote Originally Posted by Universal Mind View Post
      You didn't ask your question until I read it? I think you posted it while I was at Wal-Mart.

      It doesn't look like I have answered the question? What if I answer it next week? Wouldn't that mean, according to you, that my answer to your question is real now?
      Whatever happens, it occurs now. When you refer something that "happened" even that occurs in the only reference point: now. Even now is a reference point, so really there is only timelessness. The past, present and future are projections of perception.

      Time exists while it has pragmatic use but it is ultimately an arbitrary description of events.

      Do I know what you mean relative to what?
      Don't be redundant. Relative to your interpretation.

      I don't think your issue of "relative to what" is valid. The particles involved moved relative to each other. They didn't have to collectively move relative to another thing.
      Particles?

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •