Thread: God of Savagery

Please...if evolution is a fact then why....

1. Are there no missing links?

2. Why have the so called intermediate man findings, like Peking and Piltdown man, confirmed apes or outright frauds?

3. How can a scientist claim parts of the human body are from evolution and no longer work if sed scientist doesn't even
know their function or prove they no longer have a function?

4. Just because fish have fins, birds have feathers, dinosaurs had claws and men have hands doesn't mean they "evolved".
That's like saying an Audi is a direct line manufacture of a VW bug.

5. Evolution is a "Theory" not a hard "natural law". Gravity is a proven natural law. Evolution isn't even proven scientific law
since it hasn't met all the requirements of the scientific method.

6. The evolution model violates the law of Bio-genesis and the cell theory.

I can't for the life of me wrap my head around the concept that someone with any sort of education can actually believe this

Has an ape ever completed a book on its own in any human language?

Last time I checked, no white mouse has ever built an atomic bomb.

I guess the cats built the great pyramids, that's news to me.

No...humans are not from apes, the fact that primate DNA has never been found to be even close to human genetics
proves that we have no ape ancestry. When you can find a single ape with the exact copy of the human DNA then we'll
talk. Till then you have a 'Theory" not fact.

Strong words, now support them.

I offer a simple analogy...

We know nature created the grand canyon through a process of time and erosion, that is fact.

We know nature can not produce organized structural complexity and explosions don't create
order. So what made the faces on Mount Rushmore?

Explosions provided the beginning rough shapes but it took an intelligent designer to bring the
faces to existence by transmitting complex forms from the state of mind to the hand to the chisel
and hammer. Nature alone can not create complex life, it can only duplicate multiples from a single existing
form and then act on those multiples to help them adapt to certain conditions.

Therefore...evolution does not exist.

Originally Posted by Daniel1966

Please...if evolution is a fact then why....

1. Are there no missing links?

You worded this incorrectly. Try again.

2. Why have the so called intermediate man findings, like Peking and Piltdown man, confirmed apes or outright frauds?

I've never heard of Peking Man, but BLUELINE says it was Homo erectus, so I'll take his word for it. Besides, for every fraud, there are many more authentic fossils.

3. How can a scientist claim parts of the human body are from evolution and no longer work if sed scientist doesn't even
know their function or prove they no longer have a function?

They can.

4. Just because fish have fins, birds have feathers, dinosaurs had claws and men have hands doesn't mean they "evolved".
That's like saying an Audi is a direct line manufacture of a VW bug.

We aren't saying that. We say they evolved those things because we can see it in the fossil record over time.

5. Evolution is a "Theory" not a hard "natural law". Gravity is a proven natural law. Evolution isn't even proven scientific law
since it hasn't met all the requirements of the scientific method.

The Fact of Gravity is that objects attract/pull one another. The Theory of Gravity has to do with mass and space-time and all that mathematical stuff. The Fact of Evolution is that populations of organisms change over time. The Theory of Evolution has to do with natural selection. In both cases, the fact is what happens and the theory is how it happens.

6. The evolution model violates the law of Bio-genesis and the cell theory.

How so? Also, what is "Bio-genesis"? I think you're referring to abiogenesis, which isn't a law in the least.