|
|
1. No relevancy to life. No reason to believe in it. No proof, no nothing. Someone just said that it was true. |
|
1. No. |
|
WILDs in '06: 111
WILDs in '07: 191
WILDs in '08: 179
Actually Seismosaur I did say it first. Look at my first post in this thread. So hah! But I get your point. |
|
Surrender your flesh. We demand it.
so words aside, if u had [insert word] objects and u combined them with [insert different word] you would still have the same amount no matter what the words were |
|
WILDs in '06: 111
WILDs in '07: 191
WILDs in '08: 179
so reality is based on perception? |
|
WILDs in '06: 111
WILDs in '07: 191
WILDs in '08: 179
No. |
|
so if i didnt perceive that the earth was round it wouldn't be? |
|
WILDs in '06: 111
WILDs in '07: 191
WILDs in '08: 179
Correct. |
|
No. |
|
No. |
|
Then the nature of reality is reality. |
|
Bookmarks