I'm sure if we better understood these terms, we'd better understand God in concept. I thought I'd bring this together to simplify those arguments against God, which usually miss out important points.
First, let's look at the prefix "Omni-"
Omni - Generally means "In all ways" or "infinite in nature."
Therefore:
Omni-potence - All Power; Unlimited and Absolute. Self-destruction is impossible, by nature.
Omni-present - All Places and everywhere present; Unlimited and beyond Space and Time. Everywhere and nowhere are identical.
Omni-science - All knowledge; arises from both Omnipotence and Omnipresence. Intrinsic knowledge by infinite potential and Self-Existence.
The conclusions:
Everything is God; nothing is outside of God - that which is All Reality and Existence; infinite potentiality and beyond space and time. This means God is Eternally not subject to a location; cannot be a "dude" who waits around and neither does He posses any human characteristics, names or emotions.
He cannot be destroyed or Create non-existence because of what He Is. If the "God is invincible and so must destroy himself" and "God is infinite and therefore must be finite" arguments were true, they should simultaneously be false to maintain consistency, which is even more nonsensical. Such arguments of God's limitations (fail to) refute God with illogical premises and have no valid foundation, often ignoring the non-dualistic paradigm.
Isn't it obvious why science would fail to "prove" God? Can any argument truly refute Reality itself, without fail?
|
|
Bookmarks