• Lucid Dreaming - Dream Views




    Results 1 to 13 of 13

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      Xei
      UnitedKingdom Xei is offline
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      9,984
      Likes
      3084
      Actually there is kind of a way which bypasses my lack of knowledge about solving the above (which I'm learning about at the moment actually), as you can prove with vector calculus that the electrostatic potential energy of two particles is q1*q2/(4*pi*epsilon0*r).

      The particles will have maximum velocity when all of this has been converted to KE (at a separation of infinity), so equate the sum of their final kinetic energies to the above quantity, and then you can use the conservation of momentum (which sums to 0 here), sub that in to eliminate the other velocity, and hence get the final velocity of one of the particles.

      My final result is v1 = sqrt(q1*q2*m2 / (2*pi*epsilon0*r*m1*(m1+m2))).

      And obviously the symmetrical result for v2.

    2. #2
      Member SpecialInterests's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Gender
      Location
      Pangea Ultima
      Posts
      349
      Likes
      29
      But as the seperation distance approaches infinity that equation will go to zero, no?

    3. #3
      Xei
      UnitedKingdom Xei is offline
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      9,984
      Likes
      3084
      No, r is the initial separation which is all that matters because you're calculating the energy of the whole system which is constant.

    4. #4
      Member SpecialInterests's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Gender
      Location
      Pangea Ultima
      Posts
      349
      Likes
      29
      I plugged in the numbers but the velocities that come out of it are too small I think. I got 13.9 m/s for the lighter sphere and 4.25 m/s for the heavier sphere.

      However, the accelerations were 261 m/s^2 and 80.1 m/s^2.

    5. #5
      Xei
      UnitedKingdom Xei is offline
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      9,984
      Likes
      3084
      Why do you think those values are incorrect?

      Given those large accelerations, the particles only need to accelerate for a fraction of a second before the electrostatic force has decreased by a large factor and their accelerations become neglibible.

      I could of course have slipped up in deriving my formula (I get the same numerical answers as you). Try it yourself and check that it comes out okay.

    6. #6
      Member SpecialInterests's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Gender
      Location
      Pangea Ultima
      Posts
      349
      Likes
      29
      Hey Xei what you said makes sense I didn't really think of that :/

      It turns out those values are correct, thanks a lot for the help!

    7. #7
      Xei
      UnitedKingdom Xei is offline
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      9,984
      Likes
      3084
      Any time. I needed something to warm up with today anyway.

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •