I don't see how this proves anything. |
|
The Chinese room argument comprises a thought experiment and associated arguments by John Searle (1980), which attempts to show that a symbol-processing machine like a computer can never be properly described as having a "mind" or "understanding", regardless of how intelligently it may behave. |
|
I don't see how this proves anything. |
|
Surrender your flesh. We demand it.
I always agreed with the idea that Computers can never have a 'mind,' like we do. However, we can get pretty damn close I think. |
|
Can you see me now?
What is consciousness but signals? I'm not sure. |
|
You merely have to change your point of view slightly, and then that glass will sparkle when it reflects the light.
I don't know... I'm currently studying artificial intelligence, so I'm sure I'll get this argument covered in a history class or something. Until then, I don't know whether machines can have a mind of their own. I guess we'll only know when my robots take over the planet. |
|
Willpower |
|
"La bellezza del paessa di Galilei!"
Bookmarks