• Lucid Dreaming - Dream Views




    Results 1 to 25 of 26

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      !DIREKTOR! Adam's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Gender
      Location
      Aquanina's closet
      Posts
      5,195
      Likes
      34
      I looks just like Chrome, just a little better, however, after using for an hour we back to Chrome, doesn't appear faster on my PC...

    2. #2
      Banned
      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Location
      Out Chasing Rabbits
      Posts
      15,193
      Likes
      935
      Safari has never been terribly fast on PC. At work I use it occasionally, it crawls, it's slower than Firefox, but on my Mac it's screaming fast. Same framekwork and webkit, I don't get it.

    3. #3
      never better Achievements:
      1 year registered Veteran First Class 10000 Hall Points
      Bearsy's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 2007
      Gender
      Location
      BuffaLOVE, New York
      Posts
      2,825
      Likes
      69
      Is Chrome considered stable now? I used it for a few weeks when it first launched but all I kept hearing was not to use it yet as it's too exploitable and unsafe.

    4. #4
      Amateur WILDer
      Join Date
      Apr 2006
      Posts
      978
      Likes
      12
      I feel bad for anyone who has a compute ancient enough where browsers actually feel different performance-wise.

      Though on small devices it could be of some use, but for desktops/laptops... come on.

    5. #5
      ├┼┼┼┼┤
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Gender
      Location
      Equestria
      Posts
      6,315
      Likes
      1191
      DJ Entries
      1
      blade5x, no matter how fantastic your computer is, different software will always perform differently. It's also higly relevant whether the browser uses a lot of power. Browser developers could easily make the fastest browser ever. Problem is, it requires 1GB free RAM, a 3GHz dual-core processor and a CUDA compatible GPU and operating system.
      What browser developers aim for, is good performance with less hardware usage. I.E. FireFox has always been wellknown for stupid memory leaks, where its RAM usage would just slowly rise higher and higher. That's why browser performance is relevant, even if you have a good computer.

      ---------
      Lost count of how many lucid dreams I've had
      ---------

    6. #6
      FBI agent Ynot's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Gender
      Location
      Southend, Essex
      Posts
      4,337
      Likes
      14
      Quote Originally Posted by Marvo View Post
      I.E. FireFox has always been wellknown for stupid memory leaks, where its RAM usage would just slowly rise higher and higher.
      ram usage did indeed creep up and up on windows, but this was nothing to do with memory leaks in firefox
      (\_ _/)
      (='.'=)
      (")_(")

    7. #7
      ├┼┼┼┼┤
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Gender
      Location
      Equestria
      Posts
      6,315
      Likes
      1191
      DJ Entries
      1
      Wasn't the bug only happening in FireFox? I mean sure, maybe it wasn't doing that on Linux, but if it's doing it on Windows and no other browsers are, then it's a memory leak.

      ---------
      Lost count of how many lucid dreams I've had
      ---------

    8. #8
      FBI agent Ynot's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Gender
      Location
      Southend, Essex
      Posts
      4,337
      Likes
      14
      the main issue today is Javascript performance

      Javascript is (inherently) single threaded
      so to get any sort of performance out of JS heavy web-apps, it's now up to the browser to act as a little mini-OS and manage workloads between JS function calls
      (\_ _/)
      (='.'=)
      (")_(")

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •