• Lucid Dreaming - Dream Views




    Results 1 to 25 of 109

    Thread: iMac?

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      Ehh..Well..Uhm...HUGS!
      Join Date
      Dec 2008
      Gender
      Location
      Netherlands
      Posts
      842
      Likes
      0
      Quote Originally Posted by ninja9578 View Post
      This statement is about a decade out of date. It's almost as out of date as "Macs have a one button mouse."

      If you've used iTunes, then you pretty much know how OSX works. Unlike Windows, everything in OSX acts the exact same way as everything else. OSX has better memory management and multicore processing than either Windows or Linux. In terms of security, it's not quite Linux, but light years ahead of Windows.

      As for software, Apple software is far better than the Windows equivalent. Windows has Office, OSX has iWork, Windows has Paint, OSX has GIMP, Windows has Windows Movie Maker and Windows Media Player OSX has iLife and iTunes.

      Unlike the Windows of Quicktime, the OSX version is stable, faster, and can play any type of media.

      Best of all, the average lifespan of a PC is just over two years, where as the average lifespan of a Mac is 6 years.

      The only downside to the iMac hardware is that Apple only uses the old-fashion DVD players. It won't do bluray

      No, putting Ubuntu on it will not void the warranty. You should dual or parallel boot anyway, Linux is good, but it doesn't have the programs that OSX and Windows have. (Windows programs will run natively on OSX using Darwine, including games. In fact, OpenGL Windows games will run better on a Mac using darwine than on Winodws because it manages multithreading and memory better.)

      Both Ubuntu and OSX have very powerful disk utilities for repartitioning and verifing. Adding a second operating system is very easy using either one.
      I thank you that you took the time to type out such a long reply! There's no problem in it not doing bluray. I yet have to find a need for more than 5 gb on a single disc

      I'll think I'll make a dual-boot then, but only if I'm buying it. I promised I wouldn't until summer break. Anyway, I figured I'd get some advice early on. Thanks guys, keep them coming!
      http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l199/ablativus/spidermansig2.png

    2. #2
      Member Keresztanya's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2008
      Gender
      Posts
      1,083
      Likes
      32
      Quote Originally Posted by ThreeLetterSyndrom View Post
      I thank you that you took the time to type out such a long reply! There's no problem in it not doing bluray. I yet have to find a need for more than 5 gb on a single disc

      I'll think I'll make a dual-boot then, but only if I'm buying it. I promised I wouldn't until summer break. Anyway, I figured I'd get some advice early on. Thanks guys, keep them coming!
      Don't listen to him, most of the stuff he said was wrong. Most of the Windows programs are far better, and GIMP will run on all platforms. It doesn't really matter, because Photoshop is much better. iWork isn't that great, Office 2007 is actually pretty nice, and if you don't like it, you could always try OpenOffice(But it sucks). Macs do not last any longer than PCs, I've had this PC for 4 years, only having to put in a couple minor upgrades. I've used Macs that are 3-4 years old, they are very slow, and can hardly handle having two programs open at once. Also, iTunes is a piece of crap, it's really bloated, and infested with DRM. Foobar2000, Winamp, and Media Monkey are far better alternatives. Quicktime does not play "every media file", it's just a piece of crap. If you want to play media, get Mplayer, it's plays everything, and is pretty awesome. It's a lot better than VLC, anyway.

      Also, Macs ARE overpriced. You are paying more money for the same hardware as a PC of lower price. The average PC can be built from scratch for maybe about 1/4th of the price, and sometimes it's more expensive, depending on what you're putting on it. Building a PC with the same parts as an iMac can be up to half the price, which sort of proves that it's overpriced. And no, you're not paying for "superior quality" or any other bullshit like that, you're paying for aesthetics.

    3. #3
      Banned
      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Location
      Out Chasing Rabbits
      Posts
      15,193
      Likes
      935
      Quote Originally Posted by Demon Parasite View Post
      Don't listen to him, most of the stuff he said was wrong. Most of the Windows programs are far better, and GIMP will run on all platforms. It doesn't really matter, because Photoshop is much better. iWork isn't that great, Office 2007 is actually pretty nice, and if you don't like it, you could always try OpenOffice(But it sucks). Macs do not last any longer than PCs, I've had this PC for 4 years, only having to put in a couple minor upgrades. I've used Macs that are 3-4 years old, they are very slow, and can hardly handle having two programs open at once. Also, iTunes is a piece of crap, it's really bloated, and infested with DRM. Foobar2000, Winamp, and Media Monkey are far better alternatives. Quicktime does not play "every media file", it's just a piece of crap. If you want to play media, get Mplayer, it's plays everything, and is pretty awesome. It's a lot better than VLC, anyway.

      Also, Macs ARE overpriced. You are paying more money for the same hardware as a PC of lower price. The average PC can be built from scratch for maybe about 1/4th of the price, and sometimes it's more expensive, depending on what you're putting on it. Building a PC with the same parts as an iMac can be up to half the price, which sort of proves that it's overpriced. And no, you're not paying for "superior quality" or any other bullshit like that, you're paying for aesthetics.
      Quicktime on Mac will play any media file other than DVDs (there is another program for that) It requires the proper codecs (like every other media player,) and will prompt you if you try to open a file that you have to download the codec for.

      Photoshop is a Mac program, the Windows version is the port. Photoshop also doesn't come with Windows, it's $900 for the whole Adobe package (cheaper if you're a student.)

      The average PC lifespan is 2 years. It's problem is that the core of it is the registry, which requires additional software to clean. The disk also gets fragmented, which most people forget to fix. The average span of a Mac is 6 years. No one cares how long your PC lasted, average is what people should look at.

      Word has an absolutely terrible rendering and formatting engine. iWork has a LaTeX backend. LaTeX has been the word processing gold standard for 35 years. Keynote is considered he gold standard in presentation tools. The only thing that Office has that's better than the iWork equivalent is Excel, but unless you're doing advanced metrics, Numbers will suit you just fine.

      You need to come up with some figures that show that Macs are overprices, not just saying that they are. Find a PC with a quad core processor, all-in-one display and computer, 20" screen, Nvidia gfx card and Intel gfx card, 5 receiver n wireless receiver, and 4gb of DDR3 ram that's significantly cheaper than a 20" iMac (running Windows of course, Linux PCs are always cheaper because their OS is free).
      Last edited by ninja9578; 05-04-2009 at 10:24 PM.

    4. #4
      What's up <span class='glow_006400'>[SomeGuy]</span>'s Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2007
      LD Count
      About 1
      Gender
      Location
      Tmux on Debian
      Posts
      2,862
      Likes
      130
      DJ Entries
      4
      Quote Originally Posted by Demon Parasite View Post
      Don't listen to him, most of the stuff he said was wrong. Most of the Windows programs are far better, and GIMP will run on all platforms. It doesn't really matter, because Photoshop is much better.
      Photoshop is not all that much better, they're about the same.
      iWork isn't that great, Office 2007 is actually pretty nice, and if you don't like it, you could always try OpenOffice(But it sucks).
      WTF. MS Office released for Macs as well, so I don't know what you're talking about. And OpenOffice IMO is better than MS Office, it has features the latter does not. I love it far better.
      Macs do not last any longer than PCs, I've had this PC for 4 years, only having to put in a couple minor upgrades.
      Macs don't NEED any upgradesm from as far as I have used it. Unless you want optional RAM and HD space.
      I've used Macs that are 3-4 years old, they are very slow, and can hardly handle having two programs open at once.
      You lost me here. I use old macs all the time, and they flow just as easily as they always did. I don't know where you got that from. I have had 5 programs open at once on an oldie, worked fine. LIER.
      Also, iTunes is a piece of crap, it's really bloated, and infested with DRM.
      iTunes store has DRM. If you get music elsewhere, it doesn't need DRM. Dummy. Also, please clairify the "crap" other than DRM (optional?) and "it's really bloated". As for the latter, how do you mean? Filesize? Who gives a shit, there's enough memory on your mac a few megs won't matter.
      Foobar2000, Winamp, and Media Monkey are far better alternatives.
      Or if you're on Linux, Rhythmbox Music Player is amazing. It doesn't make you erase all the crap on there.

      Quicktime does not play "every media file", it's just a piece of crap. If you want to play media, get Mplayer, it's plays everything, and is pretty awesome. It's a lot better than VLC, anyway.
      Quicktime was the first media player of it's kind. It has the most experience. I also use it mainly for anything I watch on a Mac. I haven't encountered a problem with it, period. Sources for the "it's just a piece of crap".
      Also, Macs ARE overpriced. You are paying more money for the same hardware as a PC of lower price. The average PC can be built from scratch for maybe about 1/4th of the price, and sometimes it's more expensive, depending on what you're putting on it. Building a PC with the same parts as an iMac can be up to half the price, which sort of proves that it's overpriced. And no, you're not paying for "superior quality" or any other bullshit like that, you're paying for aesthetics.
      I actually mainly agree with this, but hey. Mac hardware is pretty standardized, so it's actually a good thing. Bringing computers closer to game consoles.

      Hey guys, I'm back. Feels good man
      ---------------------------------------------------
      WTF|Jesus lul
      spam removed

    5. #5
      MSG
      MSG is offline
      Colloquial MSG's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2004
      LD Count
      1
      Posts
      1,363
      Likes
      14
      We use the new iMacs at school for video production, they're very nice. If you're not used to OS X then theres a slight learning curve. Not too hard to master. So far the only problems I've ran into involve the retarded network setup we have. The machines are powerful, but quiet (the mac room doesnt have the constant whirr that most computer labs have). They also have to put up with the other kids' constant abuse, and do so quite well.

      I've never been a fan of all-in-ones, but admittedly dealing with wires everywhere is getting really old. If you've got the money I say why not, TAKE THE PLUNGE

    6. #6
      Ehh..Well..Uhm...HUGS!
      Join Date
      Dec 2008
      Gender
      Location
      Netherlands
      Posts
      842
      Likes
      0
      Quote Originally Posted by Demon Parasite View Post
      Don't listen to him, most of the stuff he said was wrong. Most of the Windows programs are far better, and GIMP will run on all platforms. It doesn't really matter, because Photoshop is much better. iWork isn't that great, Office 2007 is actually pretty nice, and if you don't like it, you could always try OpenOffice(But it sucks).
      I prefer OO over MO anytime. I do like photoshop better, but as Ninja said, it's a Mac OSX app, so I'll have to see how that goes.

      Quote Originally Posted by Demon Parasite View Post
      Macs do not last any longer than PCs, I've had this PC for 4 years, only having to put in a couple minor upgrades. I've used Macs that are 3-4 years old, they are very slow, and can hardly handle having two programs open at once.
      I don't have a clue about that, but I've looked at the structure of a mac, and they don't seem to have any problems with cluttered registries and stuff like that.

      Quote Originally Posted by Demon Parasite View Post
      Also, iTunes is a piece of crap, it's really bloated, and infested with DRM. Foobar2000, Winamp, and Media Monkey are far better alternatives. Quicktime does not play "every media file", it's just a piece of crap. If you want to play media, get Mplayer, it's plays everything, and is pretty awesome. It's a lot better than VLC, anyway.
      What's with you trying to shoot down every piece of software the mac has? As far as I've used macs, they seem reliable and not all that hard to use. I can handle a learning curve.

      Quote Originally Posted by Demon Parasite View Post
      Also, Macs ARE overpriced. You are paying more money for the same hardware as a PC of lower price. The average PC can be built from scratch for maybe about 1/4th of the price, and sometimes it's more expensive, depending on what you're putting on it. Building a PC with the same parts as an iMac can be up to half the price, which sort of proves that it's overpriced. And no, you're not paying for "superior quality" or any other bullshit like that, you're paying for aesthetics.
      Then I'm paying for aesthetics. I absolutely hate all the wires that come out a computer these days. I'm not a big fan of clutter, and a mac keeps my desk clean. Also, macs are quiet, another big plus for me.

      I get the idea that his is turning into more of an argument than an advice thread.
      http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l199/ablativus/spidermansig2.png

    7. #7
      Banned
      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Location
      Out Chasing Rabbits
      Posts
      15,193
      Likes
      935
      Quote Originally Posted by ThreeLetterSyndrom View Post
      I don't have a clue about that, but I've looked at the structure of a mac, and they don't seem to have any problems with cluttered registries and stuff like that.
      That's because they don't have one. OSX uses plist files, which are kept clean and removed and created on application install and deletion.

      You school is using Macs for networking? They are better than Windows for that, but Sun is by far the best for networking. Sun invented networking and their OS is far more secure than anything else. With the possible exception of specialized versions of Linux specifically for security.

    8. #8
      Member Keresztanya's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2008
      Gender
      Posts
      1,083
      Likes
      32
      Quote Originally Posted by MSG View Post
      We use the new iMacs at school for video production, they're very nice. If you're not used to OS X then theres a slight learning curve. Not too hard to master. So far the only problems I've ran into involve the retarded network setup we have. The machines are powerful, but quiet (the mac room doesnt have the constant whirr that most computer labs have). They also have to put up with the other kids' constant abuse, and do so quite well.

      I've never been a fan of all-in-ones, but admittedly dealing with wires everywhere is getting really old. If you've got the money I say why not, TAKE THE PLUNGE
      I use my PC to make videos with my friends, using Sony Vegas 8, and it far outperfoms using iMovie on my school's computers.

    9. #9
      MSG
      MSG is offline
      Colloquial MSG's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2004
      LD Count
      1
      Posts
      1,363
      Likes
      14
      Quote Originally Posted by Demon Parasite View Post
      I use my PC to make videos with my friends, using Sony Vegas 8, and it far outperfoms using iMovie on my school's computers.
      yeah, iMovie is shit, we use Final Cut Pro. Personally I hate FCP, and much prefer adobe. Frequent crashes, annoying rendering issues and terrible capturing glitches (using dedicated DV decks, btw) really put a damper on workflow. Then again the capturing issue could be our shitty camera/tape situation. At home I use After Effects and Premiere for video, however I cant speak for how well they run on the mac. Never had real problems for either on Windows.

    10. #10
      Member Keresztanya's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2008
      Gender
      Posts
      1,083
      Likes
      32
      Quote Originally Posted by MSG View Post
      yeah, iMovie is shit, we use Final Cut Pro. Personally I hate FCP, and much prefer adobe. Frequent crashes, annoying rendering issues and terrible capturing glitches (using dedicated DV decks, btw) really put a damper on workflow. Then again the capturing issue could be our shitty camera/tape situation. At home I use After Effects and Premiere for video, however I cant speak for how well they run on the mac. Never had real problems for either on Windows.
      I've heard FCP is basically Premiere with a different GUI.

    11. #11
      Banned
      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Location
      Out Chasing Rabbits
      Posts
      15,193
      Likes
      935
      Quote Originally Posted by MSG View Post
      yeah, iMovie is shit, we use Final Cut Pro. Personally I hate FCP, and much prefer adobe. Frequent crashes, annoying rendering issues and terrible capturing glitches (using dedicated DV decks, btw) really put a damper on workflow. Then again the capturing issue could be our shitty camera/tape situation. At home I use After Effects and Premiere for video, however I cant speak for how well they run on the mac. Never had real problems for either on Windows.
      Final Cut Pro is a professional tool though, and it costs several hundred dollars. iMovie comes with every new Mac for free.

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •