Thread: Is It Really That Complex to Add a C++ Library?

I recommend using GCC instead, Borland is a nightmare.

The library that you want is called OpenGL. It's always downloaded precompiled, because compiling it takes several hours. It's a MONSTEROUS library, but it's broken up so if you add it statically (which you should,) you only get what you need added to it.

C++ has no built-in graphics commands, it can't, it's designed to be cross-platform.

OpenGL is technically a C library, because it's old, cross language, and fast as hell. So you don't get the C++ advantages of templates, classes and such, but you can "C++"-ize it.

Code:

struct glBeginner{
   glBeginner(GLenum mode){
      glBegin(mode);
   }
   ~glBeginner(void){
      glEnd();
   }
};

void MakeTriangle(void){
   glBeginner scope(GL_LINES);
   glVertex3i(0, 0);
   glVertex3i(100, 0);
   glVertex3i(50, 50);
}

BTW, "make" should NEVER be done in DOS, it should be done in Cygwin, because make files are designed for *nix.

Originally Posted by ninja9578

so if you add it statically (which you should,)

Add statically? What does that mean?

Originally Posted by ninja9578

templates

Now you're just making me use Google more.

Originally Posted by ninja9578

BTW, "make" should NEVER be done in DOS, it should be done in Cygwin, because make files are designed for *nix.

Yep, I can put that with the rest of the information I didn't know.

Wait, is this something I can just go ahead and download off the internet, or is there more to it than just that?

Originally Posted by youssarian

Add statically? What does that mean?

There are two ways to link a library, statically and dynamically. Statically means that the executable will have the library embedded into it. A dynamic library is one that is separate from the executable and loaded when needed. On Windows it's got a dll extension. If you're doing a lot of graphics, you should add it statically because you have to load it before anything happens anyway.

Now you're just making me use Google more.

Templates are very very important to C++. It's good to lean how to use them. You don't have to, professionally, I rarely use templates, but there are times where there is no other way.

Yep, I can put that with the rest of the information I didn't know.

Thanks!

Cygwin is a Unix terminal for Windows. It gives you a real terminal, where-as DOS is a little kiddie terminal by comparison.

Originally Posted by ninja9578

Cygwin is a Unix terminal for Windows. It gives you a real terminal, where-as DOS is a little kiddie terminal by comparison.

Cygwin will link all your files with cygwin1.dll though, to provide Unix functionality. And there is a makefile tool for windows, nmake. Though you do need a custom makefile. Also, powershell is actually a pretty good windows terminal, though I can't be arsed to learn it.

Code:

./configure
make
sudo make install

done

Originally Posted by khh

And there is a makefile tool for windows, nmake. Though you do need a custom makefile.

Then what good is that? make files are designed for UNIX based systems. If you're making an nmake file, it will ONLY work on Windows, and that's not the point of a make file.

This is a good forum for C++. It's supposed to be for professionals, but students creep in every once in a while... especially during finals week for some reason
http://www.codeguru.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=9

Originally Posted by youssarian

Wait, is this something I can just go ahead and download off the internet, or is there more to it than just that?

I didn't see this. Yes, OpenGL is free and comes precompiled, you can download it off of the web. Not sure if you can get the 3.2 API, Windows is near the bottom of the importance of porting. Should be able to get 3.0 though.

I thought you said you were adept at C++...

I could have been overestimating my skills.

Originally Posted by TweaK

I thought you said you were adept at C++...

Originally Posted by youssarian

I could have been overestimating my skills.

Don't second guess yourself. I'm a professional C++ programmer and it took me 3 days to figure out how to compile wxWidgets. As in 3 full work days.

Linux is by far the easiest for this: Ynot's 3 lines will install any package. Doing it on Mac OSX is very difficult, Windows is an absolute nightmare.

Originally Posted by ninja9578

Linux is by far the easiest for this: Ynot's 3 lines will install any package. Doing it on Mac OSX is very difficult, Windows is an absolute nightmare.

Linux is super easy when it works. Which it doesn't always do.

Also, some projects include a MSVC project file, which makes it very easy to compile, if still difficult to actually install.

Originally Posted by khh

Linux is super easy when it works. Which it doesn't always do.

Errr... what?
when doesn't anything work?

Originally Posted by Ynot

Errr... what?
when doesn't anything work?

Right now, my iPhone doesn't work. Which is why I got a Nokia N900, but that's a different story.

iPhones don't run Linux, they run standard UNIX. What does that have to do with C++ libraries though? iPhone programs are written in Cocoa.


Something that I just remembered: Download and install Dev-C++. It's a deprecated IDE, but it's got something called dev-packs, which are sort of like dev-packs on Linux. Dev-C++ will automatically configure and install them for you. That's how I eventually got wxWidgets to work on my machine. Don't use it as an IDE, but it's package management is a very powerful tool.

Haha.

For one, iPhones don't run "standard UNIX". They run iPhone OS, which is based on unix, but not standard UNIX.

It has nothing to do with C++ libraries. He asked "when doesn't anything work", though, and I responded that my iPhone didn't work. I could've just as well said my vacuum cleaner doesn't work, because it wasn't a serious reply.

iPhone OS is standard UNIX. The latest UNIX standard is called UNIX '03, all Apple Operating systems are compliant with that standard.

I must admit I'm not very well informed on this particular subject, so you could very well be right. I don't care much for Apple products (granted I did like my iPhone and the iPod is a decent product, not accounting for the marketing which is obviously great) nor this particular nitpicking argument.

There's also Mingw + msys.

Mingw ports the gcc tools natively in comparison to cygwin which relies on their libs to port. Msys will provide the same functionality but for make.

MinGW is what I use on Windows.

Originally Posted by ninja9578

Cygwin is a Unix terminal for Windows. It gives you a real terminal, where-as DOS is a little kiddie terminal by comparison.

Just to make one thing clear: cmd.exe is definately not DOS in any way, shape or form. And if you want a real CLI for Windows you use PowerShell anyway.