Originally posted by Lukeman+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Lukeman)</div>
For the Text on it, you could make a simple Water Touch, so it would be wavy, if thats what you mean by blowing maybe...?[/b]
if water touch means like water ripples, then yah, that's what i was originally thinking. 
Originally posted by lucidnina+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(lucidnina)</div>
That is a great idea. I'm kinda a flash pro but the only thing that worries me would be that it would be a bit of a large file with all those animations happening at random and constantly looping. It might be hell for the people who are using dial-up. *
Here's a banner I animated and did the interactivity for. You can see it takes a tad longer to load and I got a hella fast connection. Just something to think about. http://distributionondemand.com/[/b]
yah, i'm already concerned about the banner we've tentatively decided on being too large, and obv. a flash animation is going to be larger. i think it's something to consider, anyway...remember users will be able to select different banners, so they could choose something more dial-up friendly. i think it would be pretty sweet though...with clouds moving in the background, randomly lighting up and having a bolt of electricity race down (or up), along with the leaves & branches swaying back and forth.
great job on the flash example, btw. 
anyway, many of the comments from people on the new theme involved brightness, so i'm going to play with it a little more tomorrow and probably end up darkening the horizontal-lined background just a tad to see how i like it. some others complained about the size constraint, however i don't see a way of overcoming that if we'd like to keep the shadows and the watermark. personally i don't think that's a huge issue and i suspect people would get used to it in a fairly short period of time.
once we reach agreement on colours, then maybe Dylan can finalize his banner with the watermark and we can get things rolling! unfortunately, i don't think the watermark extending below the menu bar will work if we're also going to allow users to change their banners (keep in mind other banners won't have the watermark): the watermark would be mostly stored in the header template, but the extending bit would have to be stored in each of the main body templates; that's all fine & dandy when used w/ the intended banner, but obviously won't look right when the banners are changed. the only alternative would be to have the extended bit also in the header, but then a larger gap will appear between the header and the content, which probably won't look right.
there were a few comments on the template which quite honestly i didn't even understand, so i'll have to go over them and see if there's anything else we should look at changing. personally i still think it needs something more (setting aside the fact that it doesn't have a footer yet) but i'm at a loss as to whatelse could be done.
as for a footer, i'm wondering if something somewhat similar to the banner would look good? smaller of course, and maybe changed in design...but adhering to the existing blues & greys.
<!--QuoteBegin-Dylan@
Well I meant the COLOURS *like the actual blues. I liked the blues in mine actually, yours aren't bad, they seem a bit too saturated. you know. I agree though, the whites are too light in mine, yours are nice.
hrm...i'll play with the blues then. i might still be hoping to get your help on the file folders and shadows, but i'll wait until i adjust the background and see how it looks.
<!--QuoteBegin-Dylan
Haha, can't these boards set a size limit? I remembered that on another PHP forum.
hrm. maybe?
|
|
Bookmarks