Okay, arne. It is obvious you have almost no idea about lucid dreams or what they are, nor do you respect this forum in the slightest. I know you don't like when people bring up things you've said, but I'm going to do just that.
You accuse most of the people in this forum of not even having lucid dreams.
">>By the way, I've never had a good lucid dream, and I admit it.<<
That's true of most people here, except that they don't admit it. "
That's saying more than 50% of this forum is here just to lie about lucid dreaming. We're not all here to BS each other that we have lucid dreams. We're here to work together to learn about lucid dreaming and advance ourselves. You, however, stroll in and give us a task, to test if we're lying.
Not that you're justified in the slightest, because you don't understand lucid dreams at all.
"You can't "control your dreams."
You can control your own behavoir in an LD, but no more than you can control it while you're awake, and usually even less than that."
The definition of a lucid dream is being aware that you're dreaming, but almost everyone who lucid dreams can control their dream well outside of their body. Unless they're new to controlling their dream world, it's almost a given. It's obvious that you haven't considered the dreams of others, because in most lucid dreams, the dreamer exerts control on their dream world.
Nor do you even know about lucid dream induction methods other than your random DILDs.
"Probably not, because LDs don't last long enough for you to give very much of a talk, and they occur too unpredictably.
Also it tends to be hard to remember something like a speech when you have an LD."
LDs can be inducted by many methods such as WILD or WBTB, and those are certainly not unpredictable. Lucid dreams can often last for very long amounts of time. Half an hour is not too much of a stretch.
"Men just tend to be bigger liars about it. If a young male has a screen name like "Lucid Master," he's probably never had an LD.
And people who say that LDs are all fun are lying too. LDs are just as apt to be unpleasant as ordinary dreams are."
A screen name like "Lucid Master" doesn't imply that the person who has it thinks they ARE a master of lucid dreaming. Unless they specifically claim to be a master, it's just a name. It's like calling oneself "NightLord". It doesn't imply that the person honestly thinks they are a lord of night.
Lastly, lucid dreams CAN be unpleasant, but anyone who knows how to handle lucid dreams well can turn them into pleasant experiences.
So someone with almost no real lucid dreaming experience can supposedly test if people lie about LDs? I think not.
I rest my case. If anyone wants to take arne seriously anymore, please, don't let me know. Don't expect him to answer your questions. He has no answers.
-Pojmaster
|
|
Bookmarks