Eek, so many flawed arguments 0o
And how did you do your analysis? It isn't enough to say that you reached a certain conclusion in your own, you still can't give a straight foward answer to my previous argument in which I pointed out that experience is not necessarily enough to prove that something exists, as there can be inumerous flaws in your perception/memory. By your logic, I watched 5 superman movies, and I have come to a conclusion that superman does very much exist
And you claim this on the basis of....? You're making all these claims without even taking the time to explain them.
Someone hasn't done their research...Just because babies can feel sensations in the womb does not mean that you can dream about something before you have no knowledge it exists. Studies indicate that babies enter in REM sleep yes, but no one can affirm what they dream about. The general theory is that they dream with the sounds that come from the outside the womb or the images from inside the womb. You have no information about what they dream, and you're already stating that something you don't know prove something.
Another fallacy xD! This doesn't say anything about precognition dreams and it's so irrelevant to the discussion that I'm not even gonna bother getting into the roots of this one.
What? Are you talking about sensory preconditioning? Because nothing in classical conditioning has to do with precognition. You have to explain what you mean, you're not making any sense
Bookmarks