Thanks for the info!
 Originally Posted by Hishtar
Frequency is just the number of oscillations measured over time. All energy has a frequency (it wouldn't necessarily be a static number). Solid matter at the particle level is moving very quickly, sure, but relative to liquid or gas, it is slow. Matter we can stand or sit on is vibrating/moving more slowly than the air we breath.
Generally speaking, dense media vibrate at a much higher frequency than less dense media, so matter we stand or sit on is vibrating at a much higher frequency than the air we breathe. Make something more solid and the frequency goes up, not down.
Motion and vibration are different concepts, something can be moving very rapidly relative to something else and still have zero frequency, or it can be moving slowly at a high frequency. But the motion of gas isn't higher than that of a solid either, except as a description of how disorganized the motion is. A gas has more entropy than a solid of the same substance, but motion is not meaningful for individual particles.
So vibrational frequency goes down, not up for "finer phases" of matter, and although motion has some meaning in relation to how organized the matter is, its in the same space irrespective of that. Rearranging it doesn't put it in a higher plane or different dimension, or change it into a different kind of matter that doesn't interact in the usual way with other matter.
There are also the very different kinds of vibrations of subatomic particles, but as I've described elsewhere, the frequencies involved there are incomprehensibly high for most people, and can't plausibly correspond to the vibrations that people associate with their spiritual or astral experiences.
The Schumann Resonance is electromagnetic, which is completely unrelated to the solid, liquid or gaseous behavior of groups of particles. But changes in electromagnetic frequency also don't change matter to exotic matter or move it to another plane or dimension.
I usually don't use the word dimension in this context by the say, since its scientific meaning is a single spatial degree of freedom, which is rarely what the word is used for in science fiction or when describing dream experiences. The word 'plane' also has a mathematical meaning also of course, but I guess its clear to everyone that this isn't what people mean when they talk about a dream plane.
I think the 'higher vibrational frequency' meme dates in large part from a time when radio was a new and exciting technology, so radio tuning was a compelling metaphor. And 'higher' seems 'better'. A person could argue that love, insofar as its like warmth, is 'more energetic'. But anger can be pretty energetic too, and its terrible for spiritual well being. I do think that frequency, as in song, does have some deeper meaning, but trying to equate spiritual progress with increasing frequency doesn't make any sense to me.
The idea of 'higher frequencies' is also connected to the idea of the Greek elements, with 'fire' being more energetic than 'air' which is more energetic than 'water' which is more energetic than 'earth'. And those elements are used metaphorically for spiritual realities. But as I indicated, the hierarchical states of matter thought seems to me to break down as a person better understands how stuff works, and it fits poorly with the 'vibrational frequency' idea, since more solid substances vibrate at a higher frequency.
At this point in the discussion, I've been asked, "If you don't think the ideas about vibrations make any sense, what is your explanation for supernatural experiences?" I don't have one. That's why I signed up to the site, to try to find an explanation. I can't say I've been very successful, though maybe that's understandable given the difficulty of the question.
A couple of years ago, when I tried to share a dream with WakingNomad, I experienced his "dream plane" as an actual airplane. I think our experiences of "higher planes" are in general about that far off from reality. The dreams aren't really an experience of higher realms so much as an attempt to metaphorically describe something that we don't know how to describe. If we understood more, our experiences would be radically different.
I'll try to summarize the ideas I am working with:
1. The objects that we experience or entangled with us, in a quantum mechanical sense. Let's define the 'astral realm' as being all potential objects and events that are not entangled with us. I guess this must include objects and events that aren't even possible, in any world, though those might be distinguished from objects and events that are potentially possible. Somehow, it is possible to have knowledge of that realm, and to prune or otherwise manipulate the possibilities in a way that affects outcomes in our physical world. As 'beings' in our world we're naturally limited in our ability to do that. But we're more than physical beings, and are interconnected with spirits, so to speak, that are not physical beings. I think my thought here would probably appear to me as nonsense if I knew more, but its the best I got.
2. The 'astral projection' and 'out of body' experiences that people have are for the most part a matter of consciously manipulating various aspects of their mental model of where their body is in their environment. That manipulation has a tenuous connection to our activity, so to speak, in the 'real' astral realm, but its not the same thing. Mostly the lucid 'astral' experience is a metaphor. Likewise for things like seeing auras or orbs. I think these are projected, even though some of the information projected might be real and might be acquired through supernatural means.
3. You can move your identity, you don't have to stay who you are completely. You can become other people a little bit, or become a part of something that is a little bit in a lot of people. Maybe this is a metaphor too, I don't know. It doesn't seem to be quite the same kind of thinking that other people who pursue shared dreaming, premonitions, or remote viewing are using, but its what I've gotten results from. Whether those results are of any practical use or value I don't know, but I now know objectively with a high degree of confidence that 'spiritual' stuff is real, and I guess that's worth something.
4. The spiritual realm, such as we interact with, is approximately as fucked up as humanity in the physical realm, and its fucked up in pretty much exactly the same ways. A lot of people reach for it in hopes that its better, but its not. If we want something better, we have to make something better. And that's pretty much a matter of honesty, compassion, and courage. 'Spiritual' people are not ahead of or better than 'materialist' people in this regard. In whatever world you live in, that's where you've got to make a difference.
I guess I'll leave it at that. I don't have very lucid or interesting dreams any more, but I do seem to retain a week ability to "share" dreams with people. Or it happens in any case, though I can't say that its me that's causing it. So if anyone is moderately skeptical but interested, they should feel welcome to send me a private message. If we ever get a chance to do a real scientific demonstration I would be up for that too. I think I've decided that its very difficult to make this happen, because of the way the world works, but that its possible and that its not a bad idea in principle. Its just like fighting for anything else that you want to do: you consider it worth the effort, or you don't. I proof wouldn't usher in a utopia though, the question of whether this sort of thing is real is almost orthogonal to what our real problems are.
|
|
Bookmarks