• Lucid Dreaming - Dream Views




    Results 1 to 17 of 17
    1. #1
      "O" will suffice. Achievements:
      1 year registered Made lots of Friends on DV Referrer Gold Veteran First Class Populated Wall Tagger First Class 25000 Hall Points Vivid Dream Journal
      Oneironaut Zero's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      LD Count
      20+ Years Worth
      Gender
      Location
      Central Florida
      Posts
      16,083
      Likes
      4032
      DJ Entries
      149

      CGI vs. Practical Effects...

      Ok...with the recent influx of movies with CGI effects, this has been a pretty hot debate, and one I've found myself getting into more and more, over at IMDb.

      So, what do you guys think about the great battle between CGI and practical effects? Do you think that CGI is ruining movies? Do you think its the wave of the future? Do you think it's undeniably fake? Do you think it's more grandiose than practical effects?

      Basically...where do you stand?
      http://i.imgur.com/Ke7qCcF.jpg
      (Or see the very best of my journal entries @ dreamwalkerchronicles.blogspot)

    2. #2
      The Blue dreamer bluefinger's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Gender
      Location
      UK
      Posts
      1,629
      Likes
      0
      Balance and quality are what needs to be focused on. CGI can be great... if applied appropriately with enough care. Also, practical effects may lack impact if not given enough care with the editing and general thought.

      In the end, ANY sort of effects complements a movie, whether it is CGI or practical effects. I couldn't give a damn about either as long as both are done well.
      -Bluefinger v1.25- Enter the madness that are my dreams (DJ Update, non-LD)

      "When you reject the scientific method in order to believe what you want, you know that you have failed at life. Sorry, but there is no justification, no matter how wordy you make it."

      - Xei

      DILD: 6, WILD: 1

    3. #3
      Banned
      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Location
      Out Chasing Rabbits
      Posts
      15,193
      Likes
      935
      I think CGI is good, it makes movies better. We can do things that can't be done by real people or robots. We can do pretty much anything on computers and make it photorealistic.

      We're way beyond Tron

    4. #4
      FBI agent Ynot's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Gender
      Location
      Southend, Essex
      Posts
      4,337
      Likes
      14
      I don't like the term CGI
      The original term was CG (computer graphics)
      CGI is the common gateway interface (a technical internet & networking term), and the acronym got confused with CG
      ("computer generated imagery" was coined after the fact)

      personal preference, but I like "Digital effects"
      anyway...

      it really depends on how digital effects are used

      For non-real (or difficult to achieve in real life) things, digital effects can be quite obvious, which may be a turn-off for people
      The recent spate of super hero films sort of highlights this
      (you can't realistically film a live action scene with an eight foot green giant)

      However, used for the mundane, they're indistinguishable from the real thing, and will go by completely unnoticed (aside from adding realism to the film)
      any action film involving people being shot, stabbed, having a leg blown off, etc. is almost always done using digital effects.

      Digital effects are used everywhere (and have been for a long, long time)
      it's far quicker and cheaper (not to mention more realistic) than explosive charges blowing up blood packs

      The Titanic, in the 1997 film was all done digitally

      http://www.linuxjournal.com/files/li...494/2494f1.png

      It's a boat
      but it wasn't real (did you honestly know that? - cause till I read about it, I didn't)

      (as a side note, Titanic was the first blockbuster film where Linux rose to the challenge of usurping the older Unix mainframes, providing a cheaper, more scalable software effects platform - http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/2494)

      So, do I think it's undeniably fake
      No, not at all
      however there's only so "real" you can make a completely unreal effect

    5. #5
      Banned
      Join Date
      May 2007
      LD Count
      Loads
      Gender
      Location
      Digital Forest.
      Posts
      6,864
      Likes
      386
      CGI wins when done correctly.

      Full stop.

    6. #6
      used to be Guerilla
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      LD Count
      2
      Gender
      Location
      Arizona
      Posts
      2,929
      Likes
      102
      Quote Originally Posted by Oneironaut View Post
      Ok...with the recent influx of movies with CGI effects, this has been a pretty hot debate, and one I've found myself getting into more and more, over at IMDb.

      So, what do you guys think about the great battle between CGI and practical effects? Do you think that CGI is ruining movies? Do you think its the wave of the future? Do you think it's undeniably fake? Do you think it's more grandiose than practical effects?

      Basically...where do you stand?
      IMO, CGI is great, ONLY when combined with real solid effects, in the matrix they made miniature models of ships and then used CGI to enhance it further, giving it a real look, but with added cgi to make it look even better.

      When movies rely solely on CGI for characters or objects, they look fake, and we all know it.
      I would rather die on my feet then to live on my knees.

    7. #7
      never better Achievements:
      1 year registered Veteran First Class 10000 Hall Points
      Bearsy's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 2007
      Gender
      Location
      BuffaLOVE, New York
      Posts
      2,825
      Likes
      69
      I like to use The Lord of the Rings as a great example of CG and Practical graphics working together to make something amazing.

      The bigatures of the cities, the robot people used to make the Hobbits look small. Good stuff.

      Weta Workshop and Weta Digital are definitely at the top of the game when it comes to effects.
      Last edited by Bearsy; 06-25-2008 at 08:12 PM.

    8. #8
      Back by Unpopular Demand NeAvO's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Gender
      Location
      England
      Posts
      5,090
      Likes
      9
      I think it depends entirely on the film. For example if a film is supposed to have a certain style to it, e.g. Sky Captain, Sin City and 300, then CGI can work really well in creating a mood. However, when it is used all the time and in pointless ways then it loses all meaning.

      In honesty I prefer the old fashioned way like the first Jurrassic Park film when they used anamatronics ect for the T Rex scene (still one of the most awesome scenes there is in film). Now if that scene was done using CGI then I wouldn't think much of it.

      Don't get me wrong, I like CGI, for example the matrix wouldn't have worked with out it but when CGI is used all through out a film and at pointless times when a stunt person could have been used then it loses all meaning.
      NeAvO's Nightly Journeys
      Adopted: Hazel AngelGirl Shadowsand
      Terrorhawker
      <img src=http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t58/NeAvO_2007/neavowx4.png border=0 alt= />
      Courtesy of Goldney
      Quote Originally Posted by Vex Kitten
      You're just jealous that I'm more of a man than you could ever be, sweetie pie.
      Shoot for the moon, even if you miss it you will land among the stars.

    9. #9
      used to be Guerilla
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      LD Count
      2
      Gender
      Location
      Arizona
      Posts
      2,929
      Likes
      102
      Elis your right on the money, when practical is mixed with cgi, you get such a realistic combination, you can't ever go back to using practical alone or cg alone.

      I honestly hated the CG of the vampires in i am legend, they should of used actors that wear green screen material on certain areas, and they could of used real actors and added CG onto the actors to make them atleast look real, and not so videogame like.
      I would rather die on my feet then to live on my knees.

    10. #10
      Haha. Hehe. Achievements:
      Made Friends on DV 1 year registered 10000 Hall Points Veteran First Class
      Mes Tarrant's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2007
      Gender
      Location
      New Zea-la-land
      Posts
      6,775
      Likes
      36
      I agree with Elis as well.

    11. #11
      never better Achievements:
      1 year registered Veteran First Class 10000 Hall Points
      Bearsy's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 2007
      Gender
      Location
      BuffaLOVE, New York
      Posts
      2,825
      Likes
      69
      Re: Guerilla
      The director's reasoning for the CG vamps was he had tried using actors, but they couldn't capture the intensity he was looking for.

      I agree, they looked like crap(good graphics, poor design) but it did work in the end.

    12. #12
      used to be Guerilla
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      LD Count
      2
      Gender
      Location
      Arizona
      Posts
      2,929
      Likes
      102
      I see what he means, the speed and and furiousness could not be done with actors I guess


      Yea, maybe one day CG will be good enough to fool us, but for now thats not the case lol

      I can't wait for the day that CG can create characters to life like you thought they were real actors
      I would rather die on my feet then to live on my knees.

    13. #13
      widdershins modality Achievements:
      1 year registered Created Dream Journal Made lots of Friends on DV Veteran First Class Tagger First Class Referrer Bronze 10000 Hall Points
      Taosaur's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2004
      Gender
      Location
      Ohiopolis
      Posts
      4,843
      Likes
      1004
      DJ Entries
      19
      It will always depend more on inspiration and execution than available technology.
      If you have a sense of caring for others, you will manifest a kind of inner strength in spite of your own difficulties and problems. With this strength, your own problems will seem less significant and bothersome to you. By going beyond your own problems and taking care of others, you gain inner strength, self-confidence, courage, and a greater sense of calm.Dalai Lama



    14. #14
      Member
      Join Date
      Dec 2007
      Gender
      Posts
      1,833
      Likes
      6
      Quote Originally Posted by Oneironaut View Post
      Ok...with the recent influx of movies with CGI effects, this has been a pretty hot debate, and one I've found myself getting into more and more, over at IMDb.

      So, what do you guys think about the great battle between CGI and practical effects? Do you think that CGI is ruining movies? Do you think its the wave of the future? Do you think it's undeniably fake? Do you think it's more grandiose than practical effects?

      Basically...where do you stand?
      CGI can be productive where practical cannot work. How do you practically make the Cloverfield Monster. Also, in film like the LOTR series, when massive armies are required to be portrayed, CGI can deliver, whereas practical effects are not feascible.

      Also I think that we are reaching the point where CGI is believable and to an extent realistic. It can only be up for CGI from here.

    15. #15
      "O" will suffice. Achievements:
      1 year registered Made lots of Friends on DV Referrer Gold Veteran First Class Populated Wall Tagger First Class 25000 Hall Points Vivid Dream Journal
      Oneironaut Zero's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      LD Count
      20+ Years Worth
      Gender
      Location
      Central Florida
      Posts
      16,083
      Likes
      4032
      DJ Entries
      149
      I think it's interesting to see the respect that most everyone here has given to CGI (or "digital effects," whichever suits you. ) even if their deeper feelings differ. On a site like IMDb, which is over-run with movie "snobs" and self-defined "critics," you find that a large margin of members take the purist stance of "CGI is the Devil" (etc.)

      Personally, I love CG. I believe it deserves no less respect than any other artform. Even when it's not perfect (because, really, what is?), I can accept it, as long as its a good and necessary attempt.

      Take movies like The Incredible Hulk. Many people complain because the Hulk was (almost) entirely CG. So many people say things like "why can't they just use a bodybuilder, and super-impose him into the shot as the Hulk?" I was just kind of wondering how differently people here at DV might see the argument. Heh.
      http://i.imgur.com/Ke7qCcF.jpg
      (Or see the very best of my journal entries @ dreamwalkerchronicles.blogspot)

    16. #16
      Back by Unpopular Demand NeAvO's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Gender
      Location
      England
      Posts
      5,090
      Likes
      9
      When I watched the Incredible Hulk I was sort of put off with him looking like a cartoon. Then again I sort of criticise things too much, just can't help it really. Then again they could have been going for that look to make it more comic book like.

      How ever they couldn't use Lou to play the role in this film, it needed CGI especially with the NY scenes.

      P.s I'm not saying it looked bad in this film. I think I just have a scema of what the hulk should look like compared with the 2003 film Hulk.
      NeAvO's Nightly Journeys
      Adopted: Hazel AngelGirl Shadowsand
      Terrorhawker
      <img src=http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t58/NeAvO_2007/neavowx4.png border=0 alt= />
      Courtesy of Goldney
      Quote Originally Posted by Vex Kitten
      You're just jealous that I'm more of a man than you could ever be, sweetie pie.
      Shoot for the moon, even if you miss it you will land among the stars.

    17. #17
      Callapygian Superstar Goldney's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Gender
      Location
      Budapest
      Posts
      1,901
      Likes
      11
      I think digital effects are a good thing, as long as they aren't used just to be cheaper.

      Lord of the Rings was a great example of this. They used a load of prosthetics on actors (real effects) and then for the bigger things that couldn't be feasibly made they used digital effects.
      *............*............*

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •