
Originally Posted by
Photolysis
Though I could also be biased because I read DuB's post first, and indeed it might also be the case that he suspected this, and switched the results around so he could come along later and claim how this influenced my opinion. Or MAYBE he suspected I would realise this might be the case and therefore correctly claimed #2 is more random, expecting a skeptical person like me would figure this and change to selecting #1. Or perhaps he figured out I would deduce this and therefore incorrectly claimed #2 is more random, relying on people using higher order reasoning to come to the wrong conclusion. Or...
Bookmarks