19hz causes hallucinations? That is a biased bull and a disgusting use of science.

When the eye sees an orange and sends signals to the brain we call it sight. But when that same brain reacts to 19hz, which exists in the environment as much as that orange, you call it hallucination?

Lame.

Science can not define what is or what is not real. Human bias does not. All the science has said is "19hz, that which exists in the environment, creates this experience". Sight, smell, touch, they call create experiences based on whats in the environment. What's the difference? THERE IS NONE. The only difference is what that individual calls reality. And after all, doesn't the science say it doesn't matter who the human is, atheist or theist? Anyone and everyone will experience something when exposed to 19hz. And that is a damn legitimate experience of reality as any other.

But instead of asking questions like "Well why the hell do humans even have this experience when exposed to 19hz" people instead use this science to blanket carpet the "supernatural" experience as nothing more than a mere hallucination. And its absolutely disgusting and insulting to the depth of the human experience, which is so vastly more than what materialists like to pretend it is.

What I saw was seen by five other people, at different times, without prior communication to each other. It reacted intelligently and was not directly accompanied with either dread, evil presence or terror. It's illogical to even insist that this experience is simply a hallucination, as it was seen by five other people, at different times, without prior communication. I can say that all day but the materialist still won't get it.

So how does the materialist respond to my experience? They deny it 100%. They can't accept on any level of their being that my words or true, or the words of 100's of thousands for that matter. They'll continue to bark "hallucination" regardless of how many people experience, the same damn thing (which is the working definition of reality).

Fck the materialist agenda. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence? I sure has hell do not need to provide evidence for what I experience, and neither does anyone else. And this is where the materialist gets it wrong. Its one thing to demand of religions evidence for the dogma they ask us to believe in, its another to completely dismiss the other half of the human experience.

The (scientific) FACT that certain frequencies generate positive or negative emotions regardless of that person's bias for music, speaks profoundly of the human condition and the reality we live in. Even more profound when you understand that everything that is, is, because of frequencies. That is science. That is what real science is all about.

Now, most likely, my eyes will react to the text below me and hallucinate a post.