You guys really aren't understanding my point. So I'll try it again. I'm not trying to say that anarchism is good or bad, or what its effects would be. I'm just pointing out that if you want to criticize any position, including anarchism, you need to criticize the actual position. If you define the word "anarchism" as a bunch of bad stuff, then you are not having a discussion. You're just making a circular argument. The fact that the average dumb fuck defines anarchy a certain way means jack shit. The academic definition of anarchy is totally different.