• Lucid Dreaming - Dream Views




    Results 1 to 9 of 9
    1. #1
      "O" will suffice. Achievements:
      1 year registered Made lots of Friends on DV Referrer Gold Veteran First Class Populated Wall Tagger First Class 25000 Hall Points Vivid Dream Journal
      Oneironaut Zero's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      LD Count
      20+ Years Worth
      Gender
      Location
      Central Florida
      Posts
      16,083
      Likes
      4031
      DJ Entries
      149

      The Human Consciousness Project

      I thought this article was too interesting to keep to myself.

      'The Human Consciousness Project' - Excerpts from:
      Theory of Everything,by Ken Wilber, Shambhala Publications

      This psycholgical research is a cross-cultural mapping of all the states, structures, memes, types, levels, stages, and waves of human consciousness.
      We return, then, to Clare Grave's work, which has been forward and refined by Don Beck and Christopher Cowan in approach they call Spiral Dynamics. Far from being mere armchair analysts, Beck and Cowan were participants in the discussions that led to the end of apartheid in South Africa. The principles of Spiral Dynamics have been fruitfully used to reorganize businesses, revitalize townships, overhaul education systems, and defuse inner-city tensions.
      Spiral Dynamics sees human development as proceeding through eight general memes. "Meme" is a word that is used a lot nowadays, with many different and conflicting meanings - and many critics say the word has no meaning at all. But for Spiral Dynamics a meme is simply a basic stage of development that can be expressed in any activity.
      Beck and Cowan affirm these memes (or stages) are not rigid levels but flowing waves, with much overlap and interweaving, resulting in a meshwork or dynamic spiral of consciousness unfolding. As Beck put it
      "The Spiral is messy, not symmetrical, with multiple admixtures rather than pure types. These are mosaics, meshes, and blends."
      Beck and Cowan use vasious names and colours to refer to these different memes or waves of existence. Moreover, as much research has continued to confirm, each and every individual has all of these memes potentially available to them. And therefore the lines of social tension are completely redrawn; not based on skin colour, economic class, or political clout, but on type if meme a person is operating from.
      As Beck puts it, "The focus is not on types of people, but types in people."
      The first six levels are "subsistence levels" marked by first tier thinking." Then there occurs a revolutionary shift in concsiousness; the emergence of "being levels" and "second-tier thinking," of which there are two major waves. Here is a brief description of all eight waves, the percentage of the world population at each wave, and the percentage of social power held by each.

      1. Beige: Archaic-Instictual.
      The level of basic survival: food, water, warmth, sex, and safety have priority. Uses habits and instincts to survive. Distinct self is barely awakened or sustained. Forms into survival bands to perpetuate ;life.
      Where seen: First human societies, new born infants, senile elderly, late-stage Alzheimer's victims, mentally ill street people, starving masses, shell shock. Approximately 0.1 percent of the adult population, 0 percent power.

      2. Purple: Magical Animistic.
      Thinking is animistic; magical spirits, good and bad, swarm the earth leaving blessings, curses and spells which determine events. Forms into ethnic tribes. The spirits exist in ancestors and bond the tribe. Kinship and lineage establish political links. Sounds "holistic" but is actually atomistic"There is a name for each bend in the river but no name for the river."
      Where seen: Belief in the voodoo-like curses, blood oaths, ancient grudges, good lucj charms, family rituals, magival ethnic beliefs and superstitions; strong in third world settings, gangs, athletic teams, and corporate "tribes." 10 percent of the population, 1 percent of the power.

      3. Red: Power Gods.
      First emergence of a self distinct from the tribe; powerful, impulsive, egocentric, heroic. Magical-mythic spirits, dragons, beasts, and powerful people. Archetypal gods and goddesses, powerful beings, forces to be reckoned with, both good and bad. Feudal lords protect underlings in exchange for obedience and labour. The basis of feudal empires - power and glory. The world is a jungle full of threats and predators. Conquers, outfoxes and dominates; enjoys self to the fullest without regret or remorse; be here now.
      Where seen: "The terrible twos," rebellious youth, frontier mentalities, feudal kingdoms, epic heroes, James Bond villains, gang leaders, soldiers of fortune, New Age narcissism, wild rock stars, Attila the Hun, Lord of the Flies. 20 percent of population, 5 percent of the power

      4. Blue: Mythic Order.
      Life has meaning, direction, and purpose, with outcomes determined by an over powerful Other or Order. The righteous Order enforces a code of conduct based on absolutist and unvarying principles of "right" and "wrong." Violating the code or its rules has sever and perhaps everlasting repercussions. Following the code yields rewards for the faithful. Basis of ancient nations. Rigid social hierarchies; paternalistic; one right way and only one right way to think about everything. Law and order; impulsivity controlled through guilt; concrete-literal and fundamentalist belief; obedience to the rule of Order; strongly conventional and conformist. Often "religious" or "mythic" [in the mythic-membership sense; Graves and Beck refer to it as the "saintly/ absolutistic level], but can be seculr or atheistic Order or Mission.
      Where seen: Puritan America, Confucian China, Dickensian England, Singapore discipline, totalitarianism, codes of chivalry and honor, charitable good deeds, religious fundamentalism (e.g., Christian and Islamic), Boy and Girl Scouts, "moral majority," patriotism. 40 percent of the population. 30 percent of the power.

      5. Orange: Scientific Achievement.
      At this wave, the self "escapes" from the "herd mentality" of blue, and seeks truth and meaning in individualistic terms - hypothetico-deductive, experimental, objective, mechanistic, operational - "scientific" in the typical sense. The world is a rational and well -oiled machine with natural laws that can be learned, mastered, and manipulated for one's own purposes. Highly achievement oriented (especially in America) toward materialistic gains. The laws of science rule politics, the economy, and human events. The world is a chessboard on which games are played as winners gain eminence and perks over losers. Marketplace alliances; manipulate earth's resources for one's strategic gains. Basis of corporate states.
      Where seen: The Enlightenment, Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged, Wall Street, emerging middle classes around the world, cosmetics industry, trophy hunting, colonialism, the Cold War, fashion industry, materialism, secular humanism, liberal self - interest. 30 percent of the population. 50 percent of the power.

      6. Green. The Sensitive Self
      Communitarian, human bonding, ecological sensitivity, networking. The human bonding, ecological sensitivity, networking. The human spirit must be freed from greed, dogma, and divisiveness; feelings and caring supersede cold rationality; cherishing of the Earth, Gaia, life. Against hierachy; establishes lateral bonding and linking. Permeable self, relational self, group intermeshing. Emphasis on dialogue, relationships. Basis of value communities (i.e., freely chosen affiliations based on shared sentiments). Reaches decisions through the reconciliation and consensus (downside: interminable "processing" and incapacity to reach decisions). Refresh sprituality, bring harmony, enrich human potential. Strongly egalitarian, antihierachy, pluralistic values, social construction of reality, diversity, multiculturalism, relativistic value systems; this worldview is often called pluralistic relativism. Subjective, non linear thinkingl shows a greater degree of affective warmth, sensitivity, and caring, for earth and all its inhabitants.
      Where seen: Deep ecology, postmodernism, Netherlands idealism, Rogerian counseling, Canadian health care, humanistic psychology, liberation theology, cooperative inquiry, World Council of Churches, Greenpeace, animal rights, ecofeminism, post-colonialism, Foucault / Derrida, politically correct, diversity movements, human rights issues, ecopsychology. 10 percent of the population, 15 percent of the power.
      With the completion of the green meme, human consciousness is poised for a quantum jump into"second tier thinking." Clare Graves referred to this as a "momentus leap", where "a chasm of unbelievable depth and meaning is crossed." In essence, with second-tier consciousness, one can think both vertically and horizontally, using both hierachies and heterarchies (both ranking and linking). One can therefore, for the first time, vividly grasp the entire spectrum of interior development, and thus see that each level, each meme, each wave is crucially important for the health of the overall Spiral.
      As I would word it, each wave is "transcend and include." That is, each wave goes beyind (or transcends) its predecessor, and yet it includes or embraces it in its own makeup. For example, a cell transcends but includes molecules, which transcend but include atoms. To say that a molecule goes beyond an atom is not to say that molecules hate atoms, but they love them: they embrace them in their own makeup; they include them, they don't marginalize them. Just so, each wave of existence is a fundamental ingredient of all subsequent waves, and thus each is to be cherished and embraced.
      Moreover, each wave can itself be activated or reactivated as life circumstances warrant. In emergency situations, we can activate red power drives; in response to chaos, we might need to activate blue order; in looking for a new job, we might need orange achievement drivesl in marriage and with friends, close green bonding. All of these memes have something important to contribute.
      But what none of the first tier memes can do on their own, is fully appreciate the existence of the other memes. Each of the first-tier memes thinks that its worldview is the correct or best perspective, It reacts negatively if challenged; it lashes out, using its own tools, whenever it is threatened. Blue order is very uncomfortable with both red impulsiveness and orange individualism. Orange individualism thinks blue order is for suckers and green egalitarianism is weak and woo-woo. Green egalitarianism cannot easily abide excelence and value rankings, big pictures, hierarchies, or anything that appears authoritarian, and thus green reacts strongly to blue, orange, and anything post green.
      All of that begins to change with second-tier thinking. Because second-tier consciousness is fully aware of the interior stages of development-even if it cannot articulate them in a technical fashion-it steps back and grasps the big picture, and thus second-tier thinking appreciates the necessary role that all of the various memes play. Second-tier awareness thinks in terms of the overall spiral of existence, and not merely in the terms of any one level.
      Where the green meme begins to grasp the numerous different systems the pluralistic contexts that exist in different cultures (which is why it is needed the sensitive self, i.e., sensitive to the marginalization of others), second tier thinking goes one step further. It looks for the rich contexts that link and join these pluralistic systems, and thus it takes these separate systems and begins to embrace, include, and integrate them into holistic spirals and integral meshworks. Second-tier thinking, in other wordsm is instrumental in moving from relativism to holism, or from pluralism to integralism.
      The extensive research of Graves, Beck and Cowan indicates that there are at least two major waves to this second-tier integral consciousness:

      7. Yellow: Integrative.
      Life is a kaleidoscope of natural hierarchies [holarchies], systems, and forms. Flexibility, spontaneity, and functionality have the highest priority. Differences and pluralities can be integrated into interdependent, natural flows. Egalitarianism is complemented with natural degrees of ranking and excellence. Knowledge and competency should supersede power, status, or group sensitivity. The prevailing world order is the result of the existence of different levels of reality (memes) and the inevitable patterns of movement up and down the dynamic spiral. Good governance facilitates the emergence of entities through the levels of increasing complexity (nested hierarchy). 1 percent of the population, 5 percent of the power.

      8. Turquoise: Holistic
      Universal holistic system, holons / waves of integrative energies; unites feeling with knowledge; multiple levels interwoven into one conscious system. Universal order, but in a living conscious fashion, not based on external rules (blue) or group bonds (green). A "grand unification "[Theory of Everything] is possible, in theory and in actuality. Sometimes involves the emergence of a new spirituality as a meshwork of all existence. Turquoise thinking uses the entire Spiral; sees multiple levels of interactions; detects harmonics, the mystical forces, and the pervasive flow states that permeate any organization. 0.1 percent of the population , 1 percent of the power.
      With less than 2 percent of the population at second tier thinking (and only 0.1 percent at turquoise), second tier consciousness is relatively rare because it is now "leading edge" of collective human evolution. As examples Beck and Cowan mention items that include Teilhard de Chardin's noosphere, the growty of transpersonal psychology, chaos and complexity theories, integral-holistic systems thinking, Gandhi's and Mandela's pluraistic integration, with increase in frequecy definitely on the way, and even higher memes still in the offing.......
      The Jump to Second Tier Consciousness
      As Beck and Cown point out, second tier thinking has to emerge in the face of much resistance from first tier thinking. In fact, a version of the postmodern green meme, with its pluralism and relativism, has actively fought the emergence of more integrative and holistic thinking. And yet without second tier thinking, as Graves, Beck, and Cowan point out, humanity is destined to remain vicitms of the global "autoimmune disease," where various memes turn on each other in an attempt to establish supremacy.
      This is why many arguments are not really a matter of the better objective evidence, but of the subjective level of those arguing. No amount of orange scientific evidence will convince blue mythic believers; no amount of green bonding will impress orange aggressiveness; no amount of turquoise holism will dislodge green pluralism - unless te individual is ready to develop forward through the dynamic spiral of consciousness unfolding. This is why "cross-level" debates are rarely resolved, and all parties usually feel unheard and unappreciated.
      Likewise nothing that can be said in this book will convince you that a Theory of Everything (T.O.E.) is possible, unless you already have a touch of turquoise coloring your cognitive palette ( and then you will think, on many a page, "I already knew that! I just didn't know how to articulate it.")
      As we were saying, first tier memes generally resist the emergence of second tier memes. Scientific materialism (orange) is aggressively reductionistic toward second-tier constructs, attempting to reduce all interior stages to objective neuronal fireworks. Mythic fundamentalism (blue) is often outraged at what it sees as attempts to unseat its given Order. Egocentrism (red) ignores second tier-altogether. Magic (purple) puts a hex on it. Green accuses second tier consciousness of being authoritarian, rigidly hierarchical, patriachal, marginalizing, oppressive, racist, and sexist.
      Green has been in charge of cultural studies for the past three decades. you will probably already have recongnized many of the standard catchwords of the green meme: pluralism, relativism, diversity, multiculturalism, deconstruction, antihierarchy, and so on.
      On the one hand, the pluralistic relativism of green has nobly enlarged the canon of cultural studies to include many previously marginalized peoples, ideas, and narratives. It has acted with sensitivity and care in attempting to redress social imbalances and avoid exclusionary practices. It has been responsible for basic initiatives in civil rights and environmental protection. It has strong and often convincing critiques of the philosophies, metaphysics, and social practices of the conventional religiois (blue) and scientific (orange) memes, with their often exclusionary, patriarchal, sexist, and colonialistic agendas.
      On the other hand, as effective as these critiques of pre-green stages have been, green has attempted to turn its guns on all post-green stages as well, with the most unfortunate results. This has made it very difficult, and often impossible, for green to move forward into more holisitc, integral constructions.
      In academia, the pluralistic relativism is the dominant stance. As Colin McGuin summarizes it: "According to this conception, human reason is inherently local, culture relative, rooted in the variable facts of human nature and history, a matter of divergent 'practices' and 'forms of life' and 'frames of reference' and conceptual schemes.' There are no norms of reasoning that transcend what is accepted by a society or an epoch, no objective justifications for belief that everyone must respect on pain of cognitive malfunction. To be valid, is to be taken as valid, and different people can have legitimately different patterns of taking. In the end, the only justifications for belief have the form 'justified for me'"
      The point is perhaps obvious: because pluralistic relativism has such an intensely subjectivistic stance, it is especially prey to narcisism. And exactly that is the crux of the problem: pluralism becomes a supermagnet for narcisism. Pluralism becomes an unwitiing home for the culture of Narcisims, and narcissism is the great destroyer of any integral culture in general and a T.O.E. in particular (because narcissism refuses to step outside of its own subjective orbit and hence cannot allow truths other than its own). Thus, on our list of obstacles to a genuine Theory of Everything, we might list the Culture of Narcissism.
      Ken Wilber, Theory of Everything, Shambhala Publications
      http://i.imgur.com/Ke7qCcF.jpg
      (Or see the very best of my journal entries @ dreamwalkerchronicles.blogspot)

    2. #2
      Member Achievements:
      1 year registered 5000 Hall Points Veteran First Class
      mongreloctopus's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Gender
      Location
      Oakland, California
      Posts
      778
      Likes
      13
      Very interesting concept. It sounds like governing options in sid meier's civilization games.
      gragl

    3. #3
      - Neruo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2005
      Gender
      Location
      The Netherlands
      Posts
      4,438
      Likes
      7
      Originally posted by mongreloctopus
      Very interesting concept. It sounds like governing options in sid meier's civilization games.
      Yeah indeed.

      I don't really see what this stuff has to with.. er..... relality? I kind of lost the story after the 1th thing, that one made sence.
      “What a peculiar privilege has this little agitation of the brain which we call 'thought'” -Hume

    4. #4
      Member Achievements:
      1 year registered Veteran First Class 5000 Hall Points
      Peregrinus's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2004
      LD Count
      don't count
      Gender
      Location
      Florida
      Posts
      666
      Likes
      16
      An interesting read. What is the intended application of this theory?

      Also, do you realize that those percentages add up to 111.2% of the population with 107% of the power?
      “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.”
      - Voltaire (1694 - 1778)

      The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world's problems.
      - Mohandas Gandhi

    5. #5
      Member Achievements:
      1 year registered 5000 Hall Points Veteran First Class
      mongreloctopus's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Gender
      Location
      Oakland, California
      Posts
      778
      Likes
      13
      Originally posted by Peregrinus


      Also, do you realize that those percentages add up to 111.2% of the population and 107% of the power?
      hahahah, I was wondering about that while reading it, but was too lazy to add.
      gragl

    6. #6
      "O" will suffice. Achievements:
      1 year registered Made lots of Friends on DV Referrer Gold Veteran First Class Populated Wall Tagger First Class 25000 Hall Points Vivid Dream Journal
      Oneironaut Zero's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      LD Count
      20+ Years Worth
      Gender
      Location
      Central Florida
      Posts
      16,083
      Likes
      4031
      DJ Entries
      149
      Originally posted by Peregrinus
      An interesting read. What is the intended application of this theory?

      Also, do you realize that those percentages add up to 111.2% of the population with 107% of the power?
      I dunno what the intended application is. What you see is what I saw. I only posted it because I thought the breakdown of personalities into the 8 categories was intriguing. To tell you the truth, I wasn't even thinking about the statistics. But perhaps it has to do with what he was saying about the different traits being intermeshed, in that they wouldn't be distributed to a solid 100% whole?
      I dunno, though. I'm no statistician, so that could be Way off. Just shooting in the dark.

      Here is the rest of the page, though, for anyone that wants to read it.
      http://www.meaningoflife.i12.com/consciousness.htm
      http://i.imgur.com/Ke7qCcF.jpg
      (Or see the very best of my journal entries @ dreamwalkerchronicles.blogspot)

    7. #7
      Member wombing's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2005
      Posts
      1,347
      Likes
      3
      interesting...

      shambala publishing has some excellent books.


      “If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.” (or better yet: three...)
      George Bernard Shaw

      No theory, no ready-made system, no book that has ever been written will save the world. I cleave to no system. I am a true seeker. - Mikhail Bakunin

    8. #8
      Member Darkmatic's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Posts
      180
      Likes
      0
      Originally posted by Asher
      interesting...

      shambala publishing has some excellent books.
      When i read that i thought it was someone having a go , Shambala publishing . And it still doesnt make sense .
      Live on the edge , If you don't risk anything, you risk even more.

    9. #9
      Member Achievements:
      1 year registered Veteran First Class 5000 Hall Points
      Peregrinus's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2004
      LD Count
      don't count
      Gender
      Location
      Florida
      Posts
      666
      Likes
      16
      Originally posted by Oneironaut
      But perhaps it has to do with what he was saying about the different traits being intermeshed, in that they wouldn't be distributed to a solid 100% whole?
      Yeah, I thought of that, too, but if that's the case, it kind of goes against his argument. To have those percentages add to only slightly above 100% indicates that it is not very intermeshed at all - i.e. that only a few people posses more than one trait. Also, that makes his assessment of the distribution of power very ambiguous, and without a defined formulation, the utility of any theory becomes compromised. It honestly seems like a arithmetic error – he simply forgot to add, although his inclusion of such specific percentages as 0.1% would seem to indicate that he put a fair amount of thought into assigning them.

      Anyway, this whole thing seems a bit like a sociological version of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, only one that needs quite a bit of work.
      “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.”
      - Voltaire (1694 - 1778)

      The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world's problems.
      - Mohandas Gandhi

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •