Bush Logic. Lie, or Freudian Slip?

**Oneironaut Zero** · 04-09-2006 11:19 PM

Bush's answer, in response to a young boy who asked him how he felt when he first heard about the trade center attacks: http://www.zippyvideos.com/789390596252748...6/bush1stplane/

Ok. So let's talk about this.

As far as anyone I know knows, the first eyewitness video footage of the first plane hitting the tower was not broadcast over the news until the day after Sept 11th; it is the one that pans up really quickly and shows the back of the first plane as it collides with the first tower, from what seems about a mile or so down the street.

Bush was entering the classroom within minutes of the first building getting hit, so he was occupied for a good amount of time, on camera, where he couldn't have seen any further footage than what he claims he saw.

This means one of two things, as far as I can see:

A) Bush is lying to the kid in the audience, and never actually Saw the first plane hit before he went into the classroom, and is trying to earn sympathy points

or B) Bush saw the first plane hit through a governmental lens over a closed circuit monitor, which implies he knew where to look to see the first plane hit as it was happening.

Or am I just missing something?
Any thoughts?

**mongreloctopus** · 04-10-2006 12:28 AM

i dunno, but i think the fact that the whitehouse tried to STOP the investigation into 9/11 is enough to prove they are all a bunch of dirty traitors.

**Alric** · 04-11-2006 12:48 AM

I thought they had footage of the first crash right away. If not maybe it was a simulated thing they showed of it crashing. Or maybe he remebers watching and seeing smoke comming out of the building and them saying a plane hit it and then he saw the second one crash and he mistook the second crash as the first one because they reshowed it 50 times.

Anyway I tihnk your reading to much into it.

**mongreloctopus** · 04-11-2006 01:31 AM

Originally posted by Alric

Anyway I tihnk your reading to much into it.

that mentality is why the traitor is still our 'president'

**Oneironaut Zero** · 04-11-2006 01:53 AM

Originally posted by Alric

Anyway I tihnk your reading to much into it.

Heh. I have a tendency to do that.

But, if anything, it's just cause I like to hear other peoples' input. Playing Devil's Advocate is often much more informative than going with the grain, ya know?

In this case, though, I just dunno. I think the catalyst would be whether or not live video (let's think about this now) of the first plane as it struck the tower at approx. 8:50am, was aired before approx 9:03am, when the president stepped into the classroom.

....is that possible?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/natio.../bush091101.htm

But I'll be looking around for more credibility behind that claim. Maybe I am looking too far into it, maybe not, and maybe he was just trying to smooth over the kid's question, who knows? I wouldn't mind finding out, though, 'cause as it stands, I don't think it makes sense.... which I guess, shouldn't surprise me.

To Mongreloctopus:

**Alric** · 04-11-2006 07:03 AM

Originally posted by mongreloctopus

that mentality is why the traitor is still our 'president'

Thats the reason people don't believe the real arguements against him because there so many stupid ones that make no sense.

Thread: Bush Logic. Lie, or Freudian Slip?

LinkBack

Thread Tools

Display

Bush Logic. Lie, or Freudian Slip?

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions