Thread: 9/11 Conspiracy

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

Oh, so that's a plausible 9/11 conspiracy scenario

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

CAN ANYBODY EXPLAIN A PLAUSIBLE STORY CONCERNING HOW THE SUPPOSED 9/11 INSIDE JOB COULD HAVE EVEN POSSIBLY HAPPENED?????????

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

just tell a story that is the least bit plausible whenever you are delusional enough to think you can. Do I need to explain that again?

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

The idea on the 9/11 conspiracy is for you to give an even plausible form of a story YOU claim happened

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

It looks like you can't even tell a possible version of an inside job story.

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

Now you tell me what could have even possibly happened. Nothing could have. It is impossible. Give me some retort, if you have any.

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

Are you ready to correct it and write the "real" or even possible in theory version of the story yet?

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

Tell me a version of the story that could have possibly happened.

Universal mind. I noticed this is your most recent debunking technique. To just no matter what keep saying it over and over. You should know that your going to find it pretty difficult from here because atleast 2 people, myself included. Know for certain that your specifically and purposefully spreading disinfo. And a bunch of other people have mentioned your inconsistently distracting repetitiveness. And refusal to face facts. Your weaving and dodging will continue to wake others up.

Originally Posted by Mystic7

Universal mind. I noticed this is your most recent debunking technique. To just no matter what keep saying it over and over. You should know that your going to find it pretty difficult from here because atleast 2 people, myself included. Know for certain that your specifically and purposefully spreading disinfo. And a bunch of other people have mentioned your inconsistently distracting repetitiveness. And refusal to face facts. Your weaving and dodging will continue to wake others up.

That does not tell me a plausible version of a story you claim happened.

And I said I wasn't even going to ask that any more because you obviously have nothing to answer with. So the new issue is the one R.D. raised. What supposed evidence do you have that is not circumstantial? Posting a link to a thread does not answer that particular question. All of your points in that thread are bizarrely circumstantial.

What is your best piece of evidence?

You are so evasive.

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

so I now have a different approach. I too want to ask if you have any evidence that is not circumstantial. Do you?

This approach will also fail. As circumstantial only makes up part of the evidence. Meanwhile I have evidence against what you claim. Always have from the beginning and always will. The truth doesn't change. Only disinfo and false theories change to stop the river of evidence becoming known. You can place a few stones in the way but your not going to stop it all. This is one thing we aren't just going to forget easily and let pass. The dam has broken and there is no way to contain what is essentially overthrowing the entire illusion of this manipulation. See the other thread for the evidence. You have already started to violate the other thread requirements if you continue I will report you to the administrators. I already said no defamation, straw man distracting or subversive irrelevant arguments. None of what you do.

Originally Posted by Mystic7

This approach will also fail. As circumstantial only makes up part of the evidence. Meanwhile I have evidence against what you claim. Always have from the beginning and always will. The truth doesn't change. Only disinfo and false theories change to stop the river of evidence becoming known. You can place a few stones in the way but your not going to stop it all. This is one thing we aren't just going to forget easily and let pass. The dam has broken and there is no way to contain what is essentially overthrowing the entire illusion of this manipulation. See the other thread for the evidence. You have already started to violate the other thread requirements if you continue I will report you to the administrators. I already said no defamation, straw man distracting or subversive irrelevant arguments. None of what you do.

Go tattle, and I will point to your endless stream of personal insults, such as your calling me a liar.

Originally Posted by Mystic7

Universal Mind your response is dishonest and more lies.

Originally Posted by Mystic7

You keep avoiding it all and trying to distract with your evasive measures because there is nothing else you can possibly do to face it.

Originally Posted by Mystic7

Universal mind you broken record

Stop breaking your own rules you decided you could make.

Now back to the question you keep refusing to answer... What "evidence" do you have that is not circumstantial? Be specific.

Now lets look at Universal Mind and his latest set of evasive responses. With his degree in law, combined with his degree in psychology. Repetition and word games are his only strategy for success rather than using the truth. So now I will repeat his repetitiveness and failure to respond to any material relating to 911.

Common questions asked by Universal Mind in response to 911 material.

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

Tell us specifically one piece of evidence

(no matter how much evidence)

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

Tell a plausible 9/11 inside job story.

(no matter how plausible)

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

he burden of proof is on you

(no matter how much the burden of proof is on him)

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

What is your credible source for that information any way?

Even when all his sources are not credible and our sources debunk them.

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

It is the accuser's job to explain the things

(No matter how much he accuser's without explanation)

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

The burden is on them

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

does not qualify as an argument

(no matter how much it qualifies)

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

You won't make the connection between your "evidence" and your conclusion

No matter how obvious the connection.

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

Burden of proof is on the maker of a claim

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

That was a dodge.

No matter how much he dodges, It's the other person he accusers.

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

That does not qualify as an answer.

No matter how much it qualifies.

Please quote your answers to those questions. I never saw them. And make sure you are actually answering the full questions I asked.

you never ask any proper questions relating to 911 evidence. You never explain anything. You fail to discuss anything significant. You repeat nonsense endlessly and I can never get you to give me anything that debunks all the information I give you that you refuse to read. That's because it's proven beyond a doubt and you have no choice but to ignore it. Not even one issue have you explained from my other thread. Don't pretend you have anything to base your lies and repetitiveness on. Any intelligent person can read the information I posted for themself.