 Originally Posted by Harrycombs
Universal Mind, almost every one who started a war thought they were doing the right thing. Hitler did, Xerxes did, the pope did, and so on.
That doesn't mean they actually were. Hitler was evil, but taking him down was justifiable and good. Don't you agree? Imagine what things would be like right now if his world domination quest, which he got VERY far with, had worked out.
If you don't think the media ever tries to make the U.S. look bad, start watching CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, CBS, and PBS, and listen to NPR. They are obsessed with reporting nothing but negativity and spinning it against the United States at every turn. It is disgusting.
 Originally Posted by Alric
There has been countless reports on this. There is no arguement here, its a scientic fact that the stuff is radioactive, and its a well known fact that we use it in our weapons. The government will admit to this. You put two and two togather and you know this story is true.
Your question on why does the media not cover it more, while interesting has no bearing on the story being true or false. I can only speculate on why they might not report, likely there are a number of reasons. I gave some in my last post. What I can say is that this story is true, and its been proven.
I have said that there is obviously truth to the story, but the extent of the destruction caused I would bet a million dollars is greatly hyped up. I don't think the major news corporations lie. It would be too easy for their competition to take them down if they did. What I think they do is use a great deal of spin in the form of selective angling and hyperbole in the form of facts put together to form illusion. It is a lot like the behavior of trial lawyers. It is a flat out ethics violation for a lawyer to ever tell a single lie in a legal proceeding or document. However, using facts to create illusions is perfectly acceptable. That is what the major news corporations do.
|
|
Bookmarks