 Originally Posted by Universal Mind
The most popular of the commentators are right wing. Examples are Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, and Neil Cavuto. There are also popular liberal commentators, such as Alan Colmes, Geraldo Rivera, and Greta Van Susteren.
Some of the least-liberal "liberals" I've seen on the air, today, IMO. Alan Colmes, for one, is hardly anything more than Hannity's sidekick, and allowed to get a jab in, every now and then, to keep the "illusion" (and a poor one, at that) of "fair and balanced" upheld. Hannity is the star of that show, and Colmes is simply appeasement.
As far as the FOX reporters:
I can agree with you that many of the FOX Reporters do not go off on biased tangents and whatnot. I'm actually quite fond of Uma and Laurie Dhue. They are both very charismatic and seem to be straight shooters, from what I've seen. Unfortunately, their part in the bias is being subjected to what news stories are to be talked about, which is not something that they, themselves, delegate. They simply tell the news that they are given, and are given whatever news the channel's agenda calls for. Often, therein, lies the bias - much more covert, but 'non-existent'? I'd definitely disagree.
 Originally Posted by Universal Mind
...and don't feel the need to end every segment with, "And by the way, Hillary Clinton masturbates goats," which is the type of behavior the newscasters at CNN and MSNBC engage in regarding Republicans.
Please show as many examples of that as you are willing to post. I'm not going to say I watch ALL the news networks, (which is a bold claim that I don't have the conviction to call you out on) but my TV is constantly on either FOX, CNN or MSNBC. My sole purpose for jumping around is exactly to compare and contrast their styles. I am constantly seeing politicians (in general) getting absolutely reemed by CNN newscasters. No matter the party (but I'm sure you know this), if they have a guest on that they have an issue with, they will take it to them. I'm not going to go so far as to say that there is [i]no[i] bias because I've seen a lot of angst against the Administration (R), and I'm not going to try to excuse it, either. I simply don't see it as the over-bearing, in-your-face bias, that FOX news blatantly shells out, about Democrats...
...At All.
 Originally Posted by Universal Mind
I watch all of the news networks, and I know that Fox is the least biased. They just seem biased to people who are very used to liberal slants on every single news story.
No. You watch "all the news networks" and believe that FOX is the least biased - which is your right. Its bias is picked up by more than people who just compare it to an absorbed liberal slant, but also by many of the people who Used To Work There. (as is evidenced in the video I posted, if you watched it. If not, I hope you find the time to. I was kinda disappointed how, in the 9/11 thread, after I posted the link to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, you had nothing to say but, after a while, went back to stating how there are "0/6" - or something to that affect - experts that believe that there is something wrong with the official story. Take the time to check out the vid posted above, before just reinforcing your argument with more, suggested, bias.)
But, of course, I know how easy it would be to say, "Oh well, that's just a small majority of people.." or "..well, those people are just anti-conservative or Bush-haters" and dismiss it all, to continue on with one's line of thinking. So we can agree to disagree on that point, because I think there is hardly anything short of a world-wide poll that would be able to convince you of FOX's blatant bias (which is not meant to be an insult, UM - simply my honest opinion) and that, particularly, is not something that I'd like to get into an endless clash of unverifiable opinions over.
|
|
Bookmarks