Thread: Freedom of speec--, Oops.

If you want to argue with me about the long term necessity of the war in Iraq

No. Universal. I was pointing out a moral issue. You obviously have concepts of what morals are as you are trying to justify the right for the police to monitor the microphone correctly, while speaking to kerry. However you miss the moral issue of what kerry is a part of and what kerry has done and contributed. This part, the most significant part of the moral issue. Has not clicked for you yet. So you assume the microphone issue is more important. Realistically you don't understand the war and serve mistakes are linked to this.

You said about the war being a 'necessity'. Now if you are living under a rock I forgive you. Otherwise your one sick puppy.

Originally Posted by Mystic7

No. Universal. I was pointing out a moral issue. You obviously have concepts of what morals are as you are trying to justify the right for the police to monitor the microphone correctly, while speaking to kerry. However you miss the moral issue of what kerry is a part of and what kerry has done and contributed. This part, the most significant part of the moral issue. Has not clicked for you yet. So you assume the microphone issue is more important. Realistically you don't understand the war and serve mistakes are linked to this.

You said about the war being a 'necessity'. Now if you are living under a rock I forgive you. Otherwise your one sick puppy.

Still not a counterargument. The issue we are discussing is not my morals. The issue we are discussing is the right to steal a microhone, the right to block out a person's presentation and steal everybody else's right to ask the presenter questions, and the right to resist arrest and how the use of a taser relates to it. It looks like you have run out of things to say on that.

Now go find one of the Iraq threads, read what I have written, and debate what I said. Please don't make up your own definition of the word "debate" or any other words when you try it.