Gee, Mystic. Lighten up. I agree that good examples are pretty cool and unexpected and, are therefor, of interest for their novelty factor. It is neat but, only the "good" examples are of any interest for their "artistic value". For example, when the Martin Luther King one sounded just like "Oh, Jesus" (I forget the exact wording). That sounded like it. Most of the others are too much of a stretch for me to even agree that "Yes, that's what it sounded like."

Oneironaught you are no-where near as bad here but I sense you also taking that tone of post-human analysis.
Saying "Most of it doesn't really sound anything like what they are saying it does" is In-Human? Ok, that's a new one to me. I thought I was more Human to actually try to understand things than to blindly agree with stretches and leaps. But ok, I stand corrected

And sorry that I'm not as fascinated by this as you'd like. I'm not trying to rain on your parade, just widen the discussion and approach.

P.S no offense intended. You called for it.
Alright, do we have to turn every thread into an argument? Universal Mind and I are only pointing out the actual, non-conspiratorial side of "backwards masking", you know, since it was all the rage some years ago when radical Christians were convinced that rock bands were 'putting subliminal Devil messages in their music.'