Thread: "The US Does Not Torture"

Originally Posted by Oneironaught

Those are the ones I mean. Actual terrorists, the ones we already know are guilty. In my opinion, once you're found guilty you ought to be treated in the harshest possible manner, as you no longer have rights of any kind.

Found guilty how? By what grounds is someone "found guilty?"
In the U.S., you are "found guilty" after you have had a fair trial. In the "war on terror," you are found guilty by suspicion, which is, often, either by association, or completely false.

So, by which grounds of being "found guilty" are you talking about, exactly?

Originally Posted by Oneironaut

So, by which grounds of being "found guilty" are you talking about, exactly?

Uhm, found guilty as in being charged as guilty of the crime by a judge. I'm not saying that those in the pictures are guilty. Those are the exceptions to the rules. I mean the way things should be. And once found guilty of such Inhuman acts as terrorism you should no longer have Human rights granted or observed. Personally, I think a swiftly-enforced death penalty would be in order.

Alright, I'll stop talking now.