• Lucid Dreaming - Dream Views




    Results 1 to 25 of 33

    Thread: Anarchy

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      Member Indecent Exposure's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Stoke, England
      Posts
      1,226
      Likes
      15
      Anarchism is a beatiful idea and many at some point in the future be enirely possible, however, highly unlikely.
      The odd thing is, orthodox anarchism rejects taking part in government in any way, so change thorugh reform is ruled out.
      Orthdox anarchists also reject the idea of violent revolution. I'm confused as to how they would ever change the system?

      Anarchism gave way to more practical systems such as socialism when people realised that it was too idealistic and rather un-realistic.
      "...You want to reclaim your mind and get it out of the hands of the cultural engineers who want to turn you into a half-baked moron consuming all this trash that's being manufactured out of the bones of a dying world..." - Terence McKenna

      Previously known as imran_p

    2. #2
      Sleeping Dragon juroara's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2006
      Gender
      Location
      San Antonio, TX
      Posts
      3,866
      Likes
      1172
      DJ Entries
      144
      Quote Originally Posted by imran_p View Post
      Anarchism is a beatiful idea and many at some point in the future be enirely possible, however, highly unlikely.
      The odd thing is, orthodox anarchism rejects taking part in government in any way, so change thorugh reform is ruled out.
      Orthdox anarchists also reject the idea of violent revolution. I'm confused as to how they would ever change the system?
      simple, they don't

      there are two types of anarchists - one who wants to spread chaos and terror and then use as a means of control, such as creating anarchy before creating communism or dictarship

      the other type of anarchist wants to spread absolute peace - because in an absolutely peaceful society there is no need for a government to tell people right from wrong - everyone 'naturally' agrees on it without needing a legal document

      obviously the first kind of anarchy is dangerous to any civilized society

      and the second kind of anarchy is virtually impossible - which is why those anarchists don't try to bring about the anarchy they believe in. That and, a revolution of any kind requires leadership, and in anarchy no leads no one. a lot of these anarchists actually do believe in a higher power, or a higher authority above man or any man made government - a higher power like heaven or God. thus they view heaven as a state of anarchy since it has no need for a human government

      this type of anarchy should be called something else since the word anarchy is not attached to thoughts of peace

      the first kind of anarchy basically means "chaos", where as the second kind means "no human government".

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •