Thread: Proof of Apollo 11 Fraud Lunar Landing

Thanks for clearing a lot of that up skysaw.

Oh and thanks -
I don't know if I have a true opinion on this. I do know when people want to see something. They are so fixated on ONE thing that to them it seems obvious. There is no more looking outside the box.
Compelling arguments always do surface from people who believe "it" to be true.
OK not always.

Here is another link with regards to the resolution http://www.faqs.org/faqs/astronomy/f...ection-22.html

Also some more skepticism. http://www.vho.org/tr/2003/1/Rudolf75-81.html#ftn1

http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeyesunda...re_161103.html

But I think the most compelling argument is the picture below

Howie (and all skeptics), would you mind commenting on the laser rangefinders? Everyone`s ignored it.

Oh and also, during the space race, NASA was willing to take bigger risks (both human and financial) to ensure that they would be the first to arrive on the Moon. Since americans have already "made their point", there really is no reason for them to have anymore manned missions there. Also regarding safety records, out of 12 maned Apollo missions, 2 ended in catastrophic failure. Out of 120 space shuttle missions, 2 also ended in catastrophic failure. I would say the record improved dramatically...