The two photos look much the same except for the maximum brightness of the faked ones, which could be because they're at night. |
|
pretty similar isn't it. The orb picture seems more defined and integrated and less cut and paste though. When you look closely. It's vastly different. One seems very harsh with not much detail and close to the lense. The other is entirely integrated into the picture with proper contrast that indicates the presence from the spaces proportions in the photo. If that fake picture is the best attempts of reproducing the mistake. Then it does not succeed in duplicating the effect to the full quality of the original orb picture. |
|
Last edited by Minervas Phoenix; 06-16-2008 at 06:41 PM.
The two photos look much the same except for the maximum brightness of the faked ones, which could be because they're at night. |
|
Known fake... |
|
Last edited by Sandform; 06-16-2008 at 06:47 PM.
In the fake example all the round circles are white and in front of everything. In the orb photo they show a multitude of degrees of proportion with a much better quality hue in and behind things. While the fake one is fuzzy daggered transparency with no indication of proportion present. |
|
Last edited by Minervas Phoenix; 06-16-2008 at 06:48 PM.
video 1: satellites - they are extremely bright when reflected by the sun. also could be two helicopters. |
|
I only picked it because you put it there. I'll not try and use it anymore if you like. But if you'll notice the structure of many of the photos in the gallery, they are structured similiar to most of the pictures in the photos you've presented. In the photos where he made them purposefully faked he probably didn't feel like wasting too much of the time making them "proportioned" accurately in the photo. But if the structure is the same (and by this I mean not only the shape, but what is inside the shape) there is no reason to think that the photos presented as "real" are anything more than particles that are in the correct places vs. faked ones where they put the particles there themselves, or go to a place where they know they will find particles. |
|
Because it was the spirit orbs. |
|
Actually, this was something put to rest a long time ago. I saw a video when I was like 10 or 11 that had the same results. It was these two men who had like lights on them, and then used a board and pieces of string with them to use their feet to bend the crops. It looks so fast because the camera that was filming it filmed at intervals of a specific set of seconds. |
|
I think this is what happened... |
|
yeah I know I put the one of the snow there because I randomly searched for orbs and they were suppose to be the genuine ones. The photos there are not very useful for us novice interpreters. That's not where the bulk of the evidence is you know. I was just being nice by giving you a chance. Giving you an even playing field so to speak. Like I said. This is not just about photography. but the photography in itself isn't fully explainable. |
|
Mmm. Well i'm just gonna leave this thread then. I don't really have anything to say about orbs other than I don't think they are real so....Pop I'm gone. |
|
yes but crop circles cannot be made from boards and people's feet or string. If your suggestion was they were trying to imitate the orbs creating the event. That is very funny but a pale cartoon like attempt to explain something superior. Even if they somehow could manifest all the effects in a proper crop circle. They would still lack the geometrical wisdom to create the amazingly complex designs. Hence my comment about your lack of awareness on the entire subject. |
|
Maybe not individually but put them all together and what do you get? |
|
Last edited by Sandform; 06-16-2008 at 07:49 PM.
Hahaha. You are severely misinformed if you are genuinely thinking that. |
|
Last edited by Minervas Phoenix; 06-16-2008 at 07:54 PM.
"The Great Orbs Of Wisdom haven't yet passed their knowledge onto you" |
|
But...But...videos... |
|
Bookmarks